Yousef Moradi1, Ahmed N Albatineh2, Hassan Mahmoodi1, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh3. 1. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. 2. Department of Community Medicine and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait. 3. Spiritual Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. rezaghanei30@yahoo.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The link between metabolic syndrome and depression has always been controversial. Different studies that have examined the relationship between metabolic syndrome and depression have reported different results. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to examine the association between depression and MetS by meta-analysis. METHODS: Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and ISI were searched for publications in English from January 1990 to February 2020. Search included cohort and cross-sectional studies aimed at examining the association between depression and MetS. The risk of bias was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity and publication bias were tested, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted. RESULTS: 49 studies with total sample size 399,494 were analyzed. Results indicated the odds of MetS was higher in depressed compared to non-depressed individuals [OR: 1.48; 95 %CI: 1.33-1.64) vs. (OR: 1.38; 95 %CI: 1.17-1.64)]. For cross-sectional studies, depressed patients in Europe (OR = 1.35; 95 %CI: 1.47-1.99) were at higher odds of MetS compared to those in America and Asia. For cohort studies, depressed patients in America (OR = 1.46; 95 %CI: 1.16-1.84) were at higher odds of MetS than those in Europe. Cross-sectional studies indicated women with depression were at higher odds of MetS (OR = 1.95; 95 %CI: 1.38-2.74) compared to men. In both types of studies, the odds of MetS decreased with age. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome is more common in depressed compared to non-depressed individuals.
INTRODUCTION: The link between metabolic syndrome and depression has always been controversial. Different studies that have examined the relationship between metabolic syndrome and depression have reported different results. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to examine the association between depression and MetS by meta-analysis. METHODS: Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and ISI were searched for publications in English from January 1990 to February 2020. Search included cohort and cross-sectional studies aimed at examining the association between depression and MetS. The risk of bias was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity and publication bias were tested, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted. RESULTS: 49 studies with total sample size 399,494 were analyzed. Results indicated the odds of MetS was higher in depressed compared to non-depressed individuals [OR: 1.48; 95 %CI: 1.33-1.64) vs. (OR: 1.38; 95 %CI: 1.17-1.64)]. For cross-sectional studies, depressedpatients in Europe (OR = 1.35; 95 %CI: 1.47-1.99) were at higher odds of MetS compared to those in America and Asia. For cohort studies, depressedpatients in America (OR = 1.46; 95 %CI: 1.16-1.84) were at higher odds of MetS than those in Europe. Cross-sectional studies indicated women with depression were at higher odds of MetS (OR = 1.95; 95 %CI: 1.38-2.74) compared to men. In both types of studies, the odds of MetS decreased with age. CONCLUSIONS:Metabolic syndrome is more common in depressed compared to non-depressed individuals.
Entities:
Keywords:
Depression; Metabolic syndrome; Meta‐analysis; Observational study
Authors: Debra L Foley; Katherine I Morley; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath; John B Whitfield; Nicholas G Martin Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Cara East; Benjamin L Willis; Carolyn E Barlow; Bruce D Grannemann; Shannon J FitzGerald; Laura F DeFina; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.894
Authors: Nicole Vogelzangs; Aartjan T F Beekman; Miranda G Dik; Marijke A Bremmer; Hannie C Comijs; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Dorly J H Deeg; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Marieke J van Leijden; Brenda W J H Penninx; Charles Agyemang; Miranda Olff; Marcel C Adriaanse; Marieke B Snijder Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Fabienne E M Willemen; Mirjam van Zuiden; Jasper B Zantvoord; Susanne R de Rooij; Bert-Jan H van den Born; A Elisabeth Hak; Kathleen Thomaes; Menno Segeren; Leonie K Elsenburg; Anja Lok Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-07-14