Literature DB >> 33646878

Spending For Orphan Indications Among Top-Selling Orphan Drugs Approved To Treat Common Diseases.

Kao-Ping Chua1, Lauren E Kimmel2, Rena M Conti3.   

Abstract

The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 provides benefits to promote the development of treatments for rare diseases that have limited sales potential. Policy makers have questioned whether this purpose is furthered in the case of "partial orphan drugs" approved to treat both rare and common diseases, as many of these drugs are top sellers. In this study we used national commercial claims data to estimate the proportion of spending in the US on fifteen top-selling partial orphan drugs that was assigned to orphan indications in 2018. Of this spending, 21.4 percent was assigned to orphan indications, 70.7 percent to nonorphan indications, and 7.9 percent to neither orphan nor nonorphan indications (for example, off-label use). These findings support growing concerns regarding the costs of granting orphan drug benefits to the sponsors of top-selling partial orphan drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33646878      PMCID: PMC8011952          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  12 in total

1.  Reforming the Orphan Drug Act for the 21st Century.

Authors:  Ameet Sarpatwari; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  CAR T-Cell Therapy: A Microcosm for the Challenges Ahead in Medicare.

Authors:  Caron Jacobson; Amy Emmert; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  What is wrong with orphan drug policies?

Authors:  André Côté; Bernard Keating
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Indication-specific pricing for cancer drugs.

Authors:  Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Oct 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Orphan Drug Expenditures In The United States: A Historical And Prospective Analysis, 2007-18.

Authors:  Victoria Divino; Mitch DeKoven; Michael Kleinrock; Rolin L Wade; Satyin Kaura
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Evaluating The Impact Of The Orphan Drug Act's Seven-Year Market Exclusivity Period.

Authors:  Ameet Sarpatwari; Reed F Beall; Abdurrahman Abdurrob; Mengdong He; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Variation in US private health plans' coverage of orphan drugs.

Authors:  James D Chambers; Ari D Panzer; David D Kim; Nikoletta M Margaretos; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Orphan Drugs Offer Larger Health Gains but Less Favorable Cost-effectiveness than Non-orphan Drugs.

Authors:  James D Chambers; Madison C Silver; Flora C Berklein; Joshua T Cohen; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The unintended consequences of the 340B safety-net drug discount program.

Authors:  Samuel Thomas; Kevin Schulman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Jessica A Myers; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the value of orphan drugs using conventional cost-effectiveness analysis: Is it fit for purpose?

Authors:  Maarten J Postma; Declan Noone; Mark H Rozenbaum; John A Carter; Marc F Botteman; Elisabeth Fenwick; Louis P Garrison
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.123

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.