Literature DB >> 27605637

Orphan Drug Expenditures In The United States: A Historical And Prospective Analysis, 2007-18.

Victoria Divino1, Mitch DeKoven2, Michael Kleinrock3, Rolin L Wade4, Satyin Kaura5.   

Abstract

The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 established incentives for the development of drugs that treat rare, or orphan, diseases. We used the IMS Health MIDAS database of audited biopharmaceutical sales to measure US annual spending on orphan drugs in the period 2007-13, and we estimated spending on the drugs for the period 2014-18. We identified 356 brand-name orphan drugs that were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the period 1983-2013. While we included orphan drugs with both orphan and other indications, we adjusted spending to include only spending for orphan indications. In 2014 dollars, expenditures on orphan drugs totaled $15 billion in 2007 and $30 billion in 2013-representing 4.8 percent and 8.9 percent of total pharmaceutical expenditures, respectively. Our future trend analysis for the period 2014-18 suggests a slowing in the growth of orphan drug expenditures. The overall impact of orphan drugs on payers' drug budgets is relatively small, and spending on orphan drugs as a percentage of total pharmaceutical expenditures has remained fairly stable. Concerns that growth in orphan drug expenditures may lead to unsustainable drug expenditures do not appear to be justified. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Keywords:  Cost of Health Care; Health Economics; Health Spending; Pharmaceuticals; Special Populations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27605637     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  11 in total

1.  The impact of the Orphan Drug Act on Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for rare skin diseases and skin-related cancers.

Authors:  Laura Karas; Christine Y Lu; Pankaj B Agrawal; Maryam M Asgari
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  ACMT Position Statement: Addressing the Rising Cost of Prescription Antidotes.

Authors:  Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi; Andrew Stolbach; Lewis S Nelson
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-28

3.  Correction to: ACMT Position Statement: Addressing the Rising Cost of Prescription Antidotes.

Authors:  Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi; Andrew Stolbach; Lewis S Nelson
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-06

4.  Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Margit Gombocz; Sabine Vogler
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2020-10-13

5.  Spending For Orphan Indications Among Top-Selling Orphan Drugs Approved To Treat Common Diseases.

Authors:  Kao-Ping Chua; Lauren E Kimmel; Rena M Conti
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 6.  Hereditary Angioedema: The Economics of Treatment of an Orphan Disease.

Authors:  William Raymond Lumry
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 7.  Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khadidja Abdallah; Isabelle Huys; Kathleen Claes; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Trends in orphan drug use and spending among children and adolescents during 2010-2020 in Korea.

Authors:  Jung Yeon Oh; Jin Yong Lee; Dong-Sook Kim
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.988

9.  Navigating the U.S. health insurance landscape for children with rare diseases: a qualitative study of parents' experiences.

Authors:  Tai L S Pasquini; Sarah L Goff; Jennifer M Whitehill
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Disease and economic burden for rare diseases in Taiwan: A longitudinal study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.

Authors:  Jason C Hsu; Huai-Chueh Wu; Wen-Chia Feng; Chih-Ho Chou; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.