Literature DB >> 33643711

Microbiomes of different ages in Rendzic Leptosols in the Crimean Peninsula.

Anastasiia K Kimeklis1,2, Grigory V Gladkov1,2, Aleksei O Zverev1,2, Arina A Kichko1,2, Evgeny E Andronov2,3,4, Elena I Ergina5, Igor V Kostenko6, Evgeny V Abakumov1,2.   

Abstract

Rendzic Leptosols are intrazonal soils formed on limestone bedrock. The specialty of these soils is that parent rock material is more influential in shaping soil characteristics than zonal factors such as climate, especially during soil formation. Unlike fast evolving Podzols due to their leaching regime, Leptosols do not undergo rapid development due to the nature of the limestone. Little is known how microbiome reflects this process, so we assessed microbiome composition of Rendzic Leptosols of different ages, arising from disruption and subsequent reclamation. The mountains and foothills that cover much of the Crimean Peninsula are ideal for this type of study, as the soils were formed on limestone and have been subjected to anthropogenic impacts through much of human history. Microbiomes of four soil sites forming a chronosequence, including different soil horizons, were studied using sequencing of 16S rRNA gene libraries and quantitative PCR. Dominant phyla for all soil sites were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Thaumarchaeota, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia and Firmicutes. Alpha diversity was similar across sites and tended to be higher in topsoil. Beta diversity showed that microbiomes diverged according to the soil site and the soil horizon. The oldest and the youngest soils had the most similar microbiomes, which could have been caused by their geographic proximity. Oligotrophic bacteria from Chitinophagaceae, Blastocatellaceae and Rubrobacteriaceae dominated the microbiome of these soils. The microbiome of 700-year old soil was the most diverse. This soil was from the only study location with topsoil formed by plant litter, which provided additional nutrients and could have been the driving force of this differentiation. Consistent with this assumption, this soil was abundant in copiotrophic bacteria from Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla. The microbiome of 50-year old Leptosol was more similar to the microbiome of benchmark soil than the microbiome of 700-year old soil, especially by weighted metrics. CCA analysis, in combination with PERMANOVA, linked differences in microbiomes to the joint change of all soil chemical parameters between soil horizons. Local factors, such as parent material and plant litter, more strongly influenced the microbiome composition in Rendzic Leptosols than soil age. ©2021 Kimeklis et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA library sequencing; Chronosequence; Pedogenesis; Rendzic Leptosol; Soil liming; Soil microbiome

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643711      PMCID: PMC7897411          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  42 in total

1.  The effect of nutrient deposition on bacterial communities in Arctic tundra soil.

Authors:  Barbara J Campbell; Shawn W Polson; Thomas E Hanson; Michelle C Mack; Edward A G Schuur
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 5.491

2.  Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy.

Authors:  Qiong Wang; George M Garrity; James M Tiedje; James R Cole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Mark A Bradford; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting.

Authors:  Romain L Barnard; Catherine A Osborne; Mary K Firestone
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 5.  Evolution and Ecology of Actinobacteria and Their Bioenergy Applications.

Authors:  Gina R Lewin; Camila Carlos; Marc G Chevrette; Heidi A Horn; Bradon R McDonald; Robert J Stankey; Brian G Fox; Cameron R Currie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses.

Authors:  Ryan T Jones; Michael S Robeson; Christian L Lauber; Micah Hamady; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Brevitalea aridisoli, B. deliciosa and Arenimicrobium luteum, three novel species of Acidobacteria subdivision 4 (class Blastocatellia) isolated from savanna soil and description of the novel family Pyrinomonadaceae.

Authors:  Pia K Wüst; Bärbel U Foesel; Alicia Geppert; Katharina J Huber; Manja Luckner; Gerhard Wanner; Jörg Overmann
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  A potential central role of Thaumarchaeota in N-Cycling in a semi-arid environment, Fort Stanton Cave, Snowy River passage, New Mexico, USA.

Authors:  Jason C Kimble; Ara S Winter; Michael N Spilde; Robert L Sinsabaugh; Diana E Northup
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.194

9.  Bacillus-related Spore Formers: Attractive Agents for Plant Growth Promotion.

Authors:  Koki Toyota
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Linking ecology and systematics of acidobacteria: Distinct habitat preferences of the Acidobacteriia and Blastocatellia in tundra soils.

Authors:  Anastasia A Ivanova; Alena D Zhelezova; Timofey I Chernov; Svetlana N Dedysh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Microbial features of mature and abandoned soils in refractory clay deposits.

Authors:  Aleksei Zverev; Anastasiia Kimeklis; Arina Kichko; Grigory Gladkov; Evgeny Andronov; Evgeny Abakumov
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.465

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.