Literature DB >> 33643602

Changes in the extracellular microenvironment and osteogenic responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells induced by in vitro direct electrical stimulation.

Kasama Srirussamee1,2, Ruikang Xue1, Sahba Mobini1,3,4, Nigel J Cassidy5, Sarah H Cartmell1.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation (ES) has potential to be an effective tool for bone injury treatment in clinics. However, the therapeutic mechanism associated with ES is still being discussed. This study aims to investigate the initial mechanism of action by characterising the physical and chemical changes in the extracellular environment during ES and correlate them with the responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs). Computational modelling was used to estimate the electrical potentials relative to the cathode and the current density across the cell monolayer. We showed expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2, c-FOS, c-JUN, and SPP1 mRNAs, as well as the increased metabolic activities of MSCs at different time points. Moreover, the average of 2.5 μM of H2O2 and 34 μg/L of dissolved Pt were measured from the electrically stimulated media (ES media), which also corresponded with the increases in SPP1 mRNA expression and cell metabolic activities. The addition of sodium pyruvate to the ES media as an antioxidant did not alter the SPP1 mRNA expression, but eliminated an increase in cell metabolic activities induced by ES media treatment. These findings suggest that H2O2 was influencing cell metabolic activity, whereas SPP1 mRNA expression was regulated by other faradic by-products. This study reveals how different electrical stimulation regime alters cellular regenerative responses and the roles of faradic by-products, that might be used as a physical tool to guide and control cell behaviour.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; bone regeneration; computational modelling; faradic by-products; mesenchymal stem/stromal cells

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643602      PMCID: PMC7894594          DOI: 10.1177/2041731420974147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng        ISSN: 2041-7314            Impact factor:   7.813


  107 in total

1.  Signal transduction in electrically stimulated bone cells.

Authors:  C T Brighton; W Wang; R Seldes; G Zhang; S R Pollack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Superoxide plays critical roles in electrotaxis of fibrosarcoma cells via activation of ERK and reorganization of the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Fei Li; Hui Wang; Li Li; Chuanshu Huang; Jiangkai Lin; Gang Zhu; Zhi Chen; Nan Wu; Hua Feng
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 3.  Multi-lineage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells - To Wnt, or not Wnt.

Authors:  Malini Visweswaran; Sebastian Pohl; Frank Arfuso; Philip Newsholme; Rodney Dilley; Shazib Pervaiz; Arun Dharmarajan
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: I-a method for determination of "real" electrode areas.

Authors:  S B Brummer; M J Turner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  H Sauer; G Rahimi; J Hescheler; M Wartenberg
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 4.429

7.  Electrical stimulation with pt electrodes. IV. Factors influencing Pt dissolution in inorganic saline.

Authors:  J McHardy; L S Robblee; J M Marston; S B Brummer
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Hydrogen peroxide: a signaling messenger.

Authors:  James R Stone; Suping Yang
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  Electrical stimulation drives chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells in the absence of exogenous growth factors.

Authors:  Hyuck Joon Kwon; Gyu Seok Lee; Honggu Chun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Electrical Stimulation Decreases Dental Pulp Stem Cell Osteo-/Odontogenic Differentiation.

Authors:  Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; Liudmila Leppik; Khyati Keswani; Sreeraj Rajeev; Mit B Bhavsar; Dirk Henrich; John H Barker
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2020-05-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  Design, fabrication, and characterization of a multimodal reconfigurable bioreactor for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Margherita Montorsi; Giada G Genchi; Daniele De Pasquale; Giorgio De Simoni; Edoardo Sinibaldi; Gianni Ciofani
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.395

2.  Using a Digital Twin of an Electrical Stimulation Device to Monitor and Control the Electrical Stimulation of Cells in vitro.

Authors:  Julius Zimmermann; Kai Budde; Nils Arbeiter; Francia Molina; Alexander Storch; Adelinde M Uhrmacher; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.