Literature DB >> 33642668

Energy consumption of using HEPA-based portable air cleaner in residences: A monitoring study in Seattle, US.

Jianbang Xiang1, Ching-Hsuan Huang1, Elena Austin1, Jeff Shirai1, Yisi Liu1, Edmund Seto1.   

Abstract

Portable air cleaners (PACs), offering both auto and manual (adjustable) operation modes, are commonly used in residences. Compared with adjustable mode, auto mode's advantage of reducing indoor PM2.5 has been previously demonstrated. This study examines the energy consumption of such PACs in six residences recruited in Seattle, United States, and compares the power consumption between auto and adjustable modes. Each residence went through a one-week-long PAC filtration session under auto and adjustable modes, respectively. PAC power consumption, indoor PM2.5, temperature, and relative humidity (RH) were measured at 10-second intervals in each residence. A linear mixed-effects regression (LMER) model was used to compare the PAC power consumption between the two modes after adjusting for indoor PM2.5, temperature, and RH. Results show that the mean (standard deviation) PAC power consumption under adjustable and auto modes were 7.0 (3.5) and 6.8 (2.6) W, respectively. The average monthly energy consumption of continuous PAC operation was estimated to be ~5 kWh for both modes. Based on the LEMR model, PAC power consumption under auto mode was approximately 3% larger than that under adjustable mode, after adjusting for living-room PM2.5, temperature, and RH levels. The implications for PAC operation mode selection in residential environments were discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auto mode; PM2.5; energy consumption; indoor air quality (IAQ); intervention; portable air cleaner (PAC)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33642668      PMCID: PMC7904108          DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Energy Build        ISSN: 0378-7788            Impact factor:   5.879


  17 in total

1.  Use of real-time light scattering data to estimate the contribution of infiltrated and indoor-generated particles to indoor air.

Authors:  Ryan Allen; Timothy Larson; Lianne Sheppard; Lance Wallace; L J Sally Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Influence of ambient (outdoor) sources on residential indoor and personal PM2.5 concentrations: analyses of RIOPA data.

Authors:  Qing Yu Meng; Barbara J Turpin; Leo Korn; Clifford P Weisel; Maria Morandi; Steven Colome; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Thomas Stock; Dalia Spektor; Arthur Winer; Lin Zhang; Jong Hoon Lee; Robert Giovanetti; William Cui; Jaymin Kwon; Shahnaz Alimokhtari; Derek Shendell; Jennifer Jones; Corice Farrar; Silvia Maberti
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01

3.  Source strengths of ultrafine and fine particles due to cooking with a gas stove.

Authors:  Lance A Wallace; Steven J Emmerich; Cynthia Howard-Reed
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Source apportionment of indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 in Seattle, Washington, using positive matrix factorization.

Authors:  Timothy Larson; Timothy Gould; Chris Simpson; L J Sally Liu; Candis Claiborn; Joellen Lewtas
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Reducing Indoor Levels of "Outdoor PM2.5" in Urban China: Impact on Mortalities.

Authors:  Jianbang Xiang; Charles J Weschler; Qingqin Wang; Lin Zhang; Jinhan Mo; Rui Ma; Junfeng Zhang; Yinping Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Indoor air pollutants, ventilation rate determinants and potential control strategies in Chinese dwellings: A literature review.

Authors:  Wei Ye; Xu Zhang; Jun Gao; Guangyu Cao; Xiang Zhou; Xing Su
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Household smoking behavior: effects on indoor air quality and health of urban children with asthma.

Authors:  Arlene M Butz; Patrick Breysse; Cynthia Rand; Jean Curtin-Brosnan; Peyton Eggleston; Gregory B Diette; D'Ann Williams; John T Bernert; Elizabeth C Matsui
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-05

8.  Cardiopulmonary effects of overnight indoor air filtration in healthy non-smoking adults: A double-blind randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Cui; Feng Li; Jianbang Xiang; Lin Fang; Ming Kei Chung; Drew B Day; Jinhan Mo; Charles J Weschler; Jicheng Gong; Linchen He; Dong Zhu; Chengjian Lu; Hailong Han; Yinping Zhang; Junfeng Jim Zhang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Effect of Portable Air Filtration Systems on Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter and Blood Pressure Among Residents in a Low-Income Senior Facility: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Masako Morishita; Sara D Adar; Jennifer D'Souza; Rosemary A Ziemba; Robert L Bard; Catherine Spino; Robert D Brook
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Impacts of the COVID-19 responses on traffic-related air pollution in a Northwestern US city.

Authors:  Jianbang Xiang; Elena Austin; Timothy Gould; Timothy Larson; Jeffry Shirai; Yisi Liu; Julian Marshall; Edmund Seto
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  2 in total

1.  In-duct grating-like dielectric barrier discharge system for air disinfection.

Authors:  Liyang Zhang; Yuntao Guo; Xuanyu Chang; Zenghui Yao; Xiaodong Wei; Zihao Feng; Dongheyu Zhang; Qun Zhou; Xinxin Wang; Haiyun Luo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 14.224

2.  Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios.

Authors:  Jianbang Xiang; Jiayuan Hao; Elena Austin; Jeff Shirai; Edmund Seto
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 7.093

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.