Masako Morishita1, Sara D Adar2, Jennifer D'Souza2, Rosemary A Ziemba3, Robert L Bard4, Catherine Spino2, Robert D Brook4. 1. Department of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing. 2. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. Community Health Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
Importance: Fine particulate matter (smaller than 2.5 μm) (PM2.5) air pollution is a major global risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Few studies have tested the benefits of portable air filtration systems in urban settings in the United States. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of air filtration at reducing personal exposures to PM2.5 and mitigating related CV health effects among older adults in a typical US urban location. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind crossover intervention study was conducted from October 21, 2014, through November 4, 2016, in a low-income senior residential building in Detroit, Michigan. Forty nonsmoking older adults were enrolled, with daily CV health outcome and PM2.5 exposure measurements. Interventions: Participants were exposed to the following three 3-day scenarios separated by 1-week washout periods: unfiltered air (sham filtration), low-efficiency (LE) high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA)-type filtered air, and high-efficiency (HE) true-HEPA filtered air using filtration systems in their bedroom and living room. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was brachial blood pressure (BP). Secondary outcomes included aortic hemodynamics, pulse-wave velocity, and heart rate variability. Exposures to PM2.5 were measured in the participants' residences and by personal monitoring. Results: The 40 participants had a mean (SD) age of 67 (8) years (62% men). Personal PM2.5 exposures were significantly reduced by air filtration from a mean (SD) of 15.5 (10.9) μg/m3 with sham filtration to 10.9 (7.4) μg/m3 with LE fitration and 7.4 (3.3) μg/m3 with HE filtration. Compared with sham filtration, any filtration for 3 days decreased brachial systolic and diastolic BP by 3.2 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.1 to -0.2 mm Hg) and 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.3 to 0.2 mm Hg), respectively. A continuous decrease occurred in systolic and diastolic BP during the 3-day period of LE filtration, with a mean of 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.8 to -0.1 mm Hg) and 2.2 mm Hg (95% CI, -4.2 to -0.3 mm Hg), respectively. For HE filtration, systolic and diastolic BP decreased by 2.9 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.2 to 0.5 mm Hg) and 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.8 to 1.2 mm Hg), respectively. Most secondary outcomes were not significantly improved. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study showed that short-term use of portable air filtration systems reduced personal PM2.5 exposures and systolic BP among older adults living in a typical US urban location. The use of these relatively inexpensive systems is potentially cardioprotective against PM2.5 exposures and warrants further research. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03334565.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Fine particulate matter (smaller than 2.5 μm) (PM2.5) air pollution is a major global risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Few studies have tested the benefits of portable air filtration systems in urban settings in the United States. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of air filtration at reducing personal exposures to PM2.5 and mitigating related CV health effects among older adults in a typical US urban location. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind crossover intervention study was conducted from October 21, 2014, through November 4, 2016, in a low-income senior residential building in Detroit, Michigan. Forty nonsmoking older adults were enrolled, with daily CV health outcome and PM2.5 exposure measurements. Interventions: Participants were exposed to the following three 3-day scenarios separated by 1-week washout periods: unfiltered air (sham filtration), low-efficiency (LE) high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA)-type filtered air, and high-efficiency (HE) true-HEPA filtered air using filtration systems in their bedroom and living room. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was brachial blood pressure (BP). Secondary outcomes included aortic hemodynamics, pulse-wave velocity, and heart rate variability. Exposures to PM2.5 were measured in the participants' residences and by personal monitoring. Results: The 40 participants had a mean (SD) age of 67 (8) years (62% men). Personal PM2.5 exposures were significantly reduced by air filtration from a mean (SD) of 15.5 (10.9) μg/m3 with sham filtration to 10.9 (7.4) μg/m3 with LE fitration and 7.4 (3.3) μg/m3 with HE filtration. Compared with sham filtration, any filtration for 3 days decreased brachial systolic and diastolic BP by 3.2 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.1 to -0.2 mm Hg) and 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.3 to 0.2 mm Hg), respectively. A continuous decrease occurred in systolic and diastolic BP during the 3-day period of LE filtration, with a mean of 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.8 to -0.1 mm Hg) and 2.2 mm Hg (95% CI, -4.2 to -0.3 mm Hg), respectively. For HE filtration, systolic and diastolic BP decreased by 2.9 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.2 to 0.5 mm Hg) and 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.8 to 1.2 mm Hg), respectively. Most secondary outcomes were not significantly improved. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study showed that short-term use of portable air filtration systems reduced personal PM2.5 exposures and systolic BP among older adults living in a typical US urban location. The use of these relatively inexpensive systems is potentially cardioprotective against PM2.5 exposures and warrants further research. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03334565.
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roger D Peng; Michelle L Bell; Alison S Geyh; Aidan McDermott; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet; Francesca Dominici Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner; Lykke Forchhammer; Peter Møller; Lars Barregard; Lars Gunnarsen; Alireza Afshari; Peter Wåhlin; Marianne Glasius; Lars Ove Dragsted; Samar Basu; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Steffen Loft Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Aaron J Cohen; Michael Brauer; Richard Burnett; H Ross Anderson; Joseph Frostad; Kara Estep; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Bert Brunekreef; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Valery Feigin; Greg Freedman; Bryan Hubbell; Amelia Jobling; Haidong Kan; Luke Knibbs; Yang Liu; Randall Martin; Lidia Morawska; C Arden Pope; Hwashin Shin; Kurt Straif; Gavin Shaddick; Matthew Thomas; Rita van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; Theo Vos; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad H Forouzanfar Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dalia Walzer; Terry Gordon; Lorna Thorpe; George Thurston; Yuhe Xia; Hua Zhong; Timothy R Roberts; Judith S Hochman; Jonathan D Newman Journal: Hypertension Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Christine James; David I Bernstein; Jennie Cox; Patrick Ryan; Christopher Wolfe; Roman Jandarov; Nicholas Newman; Reshmi Indugula; Tiina Reponen Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2019-12-08 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Sang-Yong Eom; Aryun Kim; Ju-Hee Lee; Sang Min Kim; Sang-Yeub Lee; Kyung-Kuk Hwang; Hyun-Joung Lim; Myeong-Chan Cho; Yong-Dae Kim; Jang-Whan Bae; Jun Hyung Kim; Dae-In Lee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jonathan D Newman; Deepak L Bhatt; Sanjay Rajagopalan; John R Balmes; Michael Brauer; Patrick N Breysse; Alison G M Brown; Mercedes R Carnethon; Wayne E Cascio; Gwen W Collman; Lawrence J Fine; Nadia N Hansel; Adrian Hernandez; Judith S Hochman; Michael Jerrett; Bonnie R Joubert; Joel D Kaufman; Ali O Malik; George A Mensah; David E Newby; Jennifer L Peel; Jeffrey Siegel; David Siscovick; Betsy L Thompson; Junfeng Zhang; Robert D Brook Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Xi Xia; Ka Hung Chan; Kin Bong Hubert Lam; Hong Qiu; Zhiyuan Li; Steve Hung Lam Yim; Kin-Fai Ho Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Jianbang Xiang; Ching-Hsuan Huang; Jeff Shirai; Yisi Liu; Nancy Carmona; Christopher Zuidema; Elena Austin; Timothy Gould; Timothy Larson; Edmund Seto Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 10.753