Literature DB >> 33639993

Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial.

Joshua J Fenton1,2, Anthony Jerant3,4, Peter Franks3,4, Melissa Gosdin4, Ilona Fridman5, Camille Cipri4, Gary Weinberg4, Andrew Hudnut6, Daniel J Tancredi4,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute low back pain frequently request diagnostic imaging, and clinicians feel pressure to acquiesce to such requests to sustain patient trust and satisfaction. Spinal imaging in patients with acute low back pain poses risks from diagnostic evaluation of false-positive findings, patient labeling and anxiety, and unnecessary treatment (including spinal surgery). Watchful waiting advice has been an effective strategy to reduce some low-value treatments, and some evidence suggests a watchful waiting approach would be acceptable to many patients requesting diagnostic tests.
METHODS: We will use key informant interviews of clinicians and focus groups with primary care patients to refine a theory-informed standardized patient-based intervention designed to teach clinicians how to advise watchful waiting when patients request low-value spinal imaging for low back pain. We will test the effectiveness of the intervention in a randomized clinical trial. We will recruit 8-10 primary care and urgent care clinics (~ 55 clinicians) in Sacramento, CA; clinicians will be randomized 1:1 to intervention and control groups. Over a 3- to 6-month period, clinicians in the intervention group will receive 3 visits with standardized patient instructors (SPIs) portraying patients with acute back pain; SPIs will instruct clinicians in a three-step model emphasizing establishing trust, empathic communication, and negotiation of a watchful waiting approach. Control physicians will receive no intervention. The primary outcome is the post-intervention rate of spinal imaging among actual patients with acute back pain seen by the clinicians adjusted for rate of imaging during a baseline period. Secondary outcomes are use of targeted communication techniques during a follow-up visit with an SP, clinician self-reported use of watchful waiting with actual low back pain patients, post-intervention rates of diagnostic imaging for other musculoskeletal pain syndromes (to test for generalization of intervention effects beyond back pain), and patient trust and satisfaction with physicians. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine whether standardized patient instructors can help clinicians develop skill in negotiating a watchful waiting approach with patients with acute low back pain, thereby reducing rates of low-value spinal imaging. The trial will also examine the possibility that intervention effects generalize to other diagnostic tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04255199 . Registered on January 20, 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Computed tomography; Diagnostic testing; Magnetic resonance imaging; Overuse; Patient-doctor communication; Primary care; Randomized controlled trial; X-rays/roentgenography

Year:  2021        PMID: 33639993      PMCID: PMC7910785          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05106-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  25 in total

1.  Watchful Waiting Strategy May Reduce Low-Value Diagnostic Testing.

Authors:  Larissa May; Peter Franks; Anthony Jerant; Joshua Fenton
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 2.  2016 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Morgan; Sanket S Dhruva; Scott M Wright; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Appropriate use of diagnostic imaging in low back pain: a reminder that unnecessary imaging may do as much harm as good.

Authors:  Timothy W Flynn; Britt Smith; Roger Chou
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 4.  Does regulatory fit lead to more effective health communication? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ramona Ludolph; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Using a Non-Fit Message Helps to De-Intensify Negative Reactions to Tough Advice.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Karen A Scherr; Paul A Glare; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-08

6.  Promoting Patient-Centered Counseling to Reduce Use of Low-Value Diagnostic Tests: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Richard L Kravitz; Anthony Jerant; Debora A Paterniti; Heejung Bang; Donna Williams; Ronald M Epstein; Peter Franks
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Importance of patient pressure and perceived pressure and perceived medical need for investigations, referral, and prescribing in primary care: nested observational study.

Authors:  Paul Little; Martina Dorward; Greg Warner; Katharine Stephens; Jane Senior; Michael Moore
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-13

8.  Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.

Authors:  Alan Rosenberg; Abiy Agiro; Marc Gottlieb; John Barron; Peter Brady; Ying Liu; Cindy Li; Andrea DeVries
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Information Framing Reduces Initial Negative Attitudes in Cancer Patients' Decisions About Hospice Care.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Paul A Glare; Stacy M Stabler; Andrew S Epstein; Alison Wiesenthal; Thomas W Leblanc; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein; Joshua J Fenton; Kevin Fiscella; Michael Hoerger; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Robert Gramling; Supriya Mohile; Peter Franks; Paul Kaesberg; Sandy Plumb; Camille S Cipri; Richard L Street; Cleveland G Shields; Anthony L Back; Phyllis Butow; Adam Walczak; Martin Tattersall; Alison Venuti; Peter Sullivan; Mark Robinson; Beth Hoh; Linda Lewis; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.