Larissa May 1 , Peter Franks 1 , Anthony Jerant 1 , Joshua Fenton 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
BACKGROUND: PCPs need effective communication strategies to address patient requests for low-value testing while sustaining patient -provider partnerships. Watchful waiting - allowing a negotiated period of time to pass before making a firm testing decision - shows promise as a tool for addressing patient requests for low-value testing. METHODS: Observational analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of a communication intervention designed to boost patient -centeredness and reduce low-value test ordering among 61 resident primary care physicians. Intervention effectiveness was assessed during follow-up encounters of unannounced standardized patients (SPs) who requested low-value tests. We examined associations between five physician counseling behaviors and overall patient -centeredness (Measure of Patient -Centered Communication) and requested test ordering. RESULTS: During 155 SP encounters, residents most commonly used reassurance (96% of encounters), evidence-based recommendations (97%), and watchful waiting (68 %). Resident advice to pursue watchful waiting was associated with 39% lower likelihood of test ordering (adjusted marginal effect of -38.6% [95% CI -43.6 to -33.6]). When all communication behaviors were examined together, only watchful waiting was significantly associated with test ordering (marginal effect of -38% [95% CI -44.3% to -31.7%]). Overall patient -centeredness was not associated with low-value testing. CONCLUSION: Resident physician counseling to pursue watchful waiting was associated with less ordering of requested low-value diagnostic tests, while overall patient -centeredness was not. © Copyright 2016 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
Entities: Species
Keywords:
Communication; Counseling; Diagnostic Tests; Follow-up Studies; Physical Examination; Physicians; Primary Care; Probability; Risk; Routine; Watchful Waiting
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2016
PMID: 28076254 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Board Fam Med ISSN: 1557-2625 Impact factor: 2.657