Literature DB >> 33635889

Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes.

Khaled Q A Abdullah1,2, Jana V Roedler1, Juergen Vom Dahl1, Istvan Szendey1, Hendrik Haake1, Lars Eckardt3, Albert Topf4, Bernhard Ohnewein4, Peter Jirak4, Lukas J Motloch4, Bernhard Wernly4,5,6, Robert Larbig1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock could benefit from ventricular assist device support using the Impella microaxial blood pump. However, recent studies suggested Impella not to improve outcomes. We, therefore, evaluated outcomes and predictors in a real-world scenario.
METHODS: In this retrospective single-center trial, 125 patients suffering from cardiac arrest/cardiogenic shock between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. 93 Patients had a prior successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Associations of covariates with the primary endpoint were assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and optimal cut-offs (using Youden index) were obtained.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was high (81%). Baseline lactate was 4.7mmol/L [IQR = 7.1mmol/L]. In multivariable logistic regression, only age (aOR 1.13 95%CI 1.06-1.20; p<0.001) and lactate (aOR 1.23 95%CI 1.004-1.516; p = 0.046) were associated with hospital mortality, and the respective optimal cut-offs were >3.3mmol/L and age >66 years. Patients were retrospectively stratified into three risk groups: Patients aged ≤66 years and lactate ≤3.3mmol (low-risk; n = 22); patients aged >66 years or lactate >3.3mmol/L (medium-risk; n = 52); and patients both aged >66 years and lactate >3.3mmol/L (high-risk, n = 51). Risk of death increased from 41% in the low-risk group, to 79% in the medium risk group and 100% in the high-risk group. The predictive abilities of this model were high (AUC 0.84; 95% 0.77-0.92).
CONCLUSION: Mortality was high in this real-world collective of severely ill cardiogenic shock patients. Better patient selection is warranted to avoid unethical use of Impella. Age and lactate might help to improve patient selection.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33635889      PMCID: PMC7909706          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  15 in total

Review 1.  Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: Collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Sagar N Doshi; Jonathan Townend; Robert Jan van Geuns; Patrick Hunziker; Bernhard Schieffer; Konstantinos Karatolios; Jacob Eifer Møller; Flavio L Ribichini; Andreas Schäfer; José P S Henriques
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Retrospective analysis of circulatory support with the Impella CP® device in patients with therapy refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  K Lackermair; S Sattler; B C Huber; U Grabmaier; L T Weckbach; A Bauer; H D Theiss; J Hausleiter; J Mehilli; S Massberg; S Brunner
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Prognostic relevance of serum lactate kinetics in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Maryna Masyuk; Bernhard Wernly; Michael Lichtenauer; Marcus Franz; Bjoern Kabisch; Johanna M Muessig; Georg Zimmermann; Alexander Lauten; P Christian Schulze; Uta C Hoppe; Malte Kelm; Jan Bakker; Christian Jung
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device.

Authors:  Charlene L Rohm; Bogdan Gadidov; Michael Leitson; Herman E Ray; Rajnish Prasad
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  The Impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Anthony Lemaire; Mark B Anderson; Leonard Y Lee; Peter Scholz; Thomas Prendergast; Andrew Goodman; Ann Marie Lozano; Alan Spotnitz; George Batsides
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry.

Authors:  Alexander Lauten; Annemarie E Engström; Christian Jung; Klaus Empen; Paul Erne; Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker; Martin W Bergmann; Roland Klingenberg; Thomas F Lüscher; Michael Haude; Dierk Rulands; Christian Butter; Bengt Ullman; Laila Hellgren; Maria Grazia Modena; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Jose P S Henriques; Hans R Figulla; Markus Ferrari
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Incidence and prognosis of vascular complications after percutaneous placement of left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Miriam Abaunza; Loay S Kabbani; Timothy Nypaver; Adam Greenbaum; Praveen Balraj; Sherazuddin Qureshi; Mohammed A Alqarqaz; Alexander D Shepard
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Overview of Impella and mechanical devices in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Hymie Habib Chera; Menachem Nagar; Nai-Lun Chang; Carlos Morales-Mangual; George Dous; Jonathan D Marmur; Muhammad Ihsan; Paul Madaj; Yitzhak Rosen
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.166

9.  Lactate and lactate clearance as valuable tool to evaluate ECMO therapy in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Ingo Slottosch; Oliver Liakopoulos; Elmar Kuhn; Maximilian Scherner; Antje-Christin Deppe; Anton Sabashnikov; Navid Mader; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Jens Wippermann; Thorsten Wahlers
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.425

10.  The Lactate/Albumin Ratio: A Valuable Tool for Risk Stratification in Septic Patients Admitted to ICU.

Authors:  Michael Lichtenauer; Bernhard Wernly; Bernhard Ohnewein; Marcus Franz; Bjoern Kabisch; Johanna Muessig; Maryna Masyuk; Alexander Lauten; Paul Christian Schulze; Uta C Hoppe; Malte Kelm; Christian Jung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.