Literature DB >> 24090575

The Impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock.

Anthony Lemaire1, Mark B Anderson2, Leonard Y Lee2, Peter Scholz2, Thomas Prendergast2, Andrew Goodman2, Ann Marie Lozano2, Alan Spotnitz2, George Batsides2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute cardiogenic shock is associated with high mortality rates. Mechanical circulatory devices have been increasingly used in this setting for hemodynamic support. The Impella device (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) is a microaxial left ventricular assist device that can be inserted using a less invasive technique. This study was conducted to determine the outcome of patients who have undergone placement of the Impella device for acute cardiogenic shock in our institution.
METHODS: A retrospective record review of 47 patients who underwent placement of the Impella device was performed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2011. Records were evaluated for demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. Operative mortality was defined as death within 30 days of the operation.
RESULTS: The patients (33 male) were an average age of 60.23 ± 13 years. The indication for placement of the Impella device included cardiogenic shock in 15 patients (32%) and postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 32 (68%). Of the 47 patients, 38 (80%) received the Impella 5.0 and the rest the 2.5 device. Ventricular function recovered in 34 of 47 patients (72%), and the device was removed, with 4 patients (8%) transitioned to long-term ventricular assist devices. The 30-day mortality was 25% (12 of 47 patients). Complications occurred in 14 patients (30%), consisting of device malfunction, high purge pressures, tube fracture, and groin hematoma.
CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest series of patients undergoing placement of the Impella device for acute cardiogenic shock. Our outcomes showed improved results compared with historical data. Myocardial recovery was accomplished in most patients. Finally, the 30-day mortality and complication rate was acceptable in these critical patients. These benefits were all achieved with the Impella device in a less invasive method.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  27

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24090575     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  28 in total

Review 1.  The Impella Device: Historical Background, Clinical Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  James J Glazier; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-12-20

2.  Chugging to silent machines: development of mechanical cardiac support.

Authors:  Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-25

3.  Acute Cardiac Unloading and Recovery: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Acute Cardiac Unloading and REcovery (A-CURE) symposium held on 30 August 2019 in Paris, France.

Authors: 
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-18

4.  Temporary left ventricular assist device through an axillary access is a promising approach to improve outcomes in refractory cardiogenic shock patients.

Authors:  Karen M Doersch; Carl W Tong; Enrique Gongora; Subbareddy Konda; Basar Sareyyupoglu
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 5.  Contemporary mechanical circulatory support therapy for postcardiotomy shock.

Authors:  Shinichi Fukuhara; Koji Takeda; Arthur Reshad Garan; Paul Kurlansky; Jonathan Hastie; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

6.  A multicenter study of the impella device for mechanical support of the systemic circulation in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Authors:  V Vivian Dimas; Brian H Morray; Dennis W Kim; Christopher S Almond; Shabana Shahanavaz; Sebastian C Tume; Lynn F Peng; Doff B McElhinney; Henri Justino
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 8.  Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  P Elliott Miller; Michael A Solomon; Dorothea McAreavey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Microaxial Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Transplantation after LVAD Malfunction.

Authors:  Heidi J Reich; Aamir Shah; Babak Azarbal; Jon Kobashigawa; Jaime Moriguchi; Lawrence Czer; Fardad Esmailian
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-12-01

10.  The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Revascularization with Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Authors:  Gupta Sonu; Desai Rupak; Hanna Bishoy; Deshmukh Abhishek; Kumar Gautam; Sachdeva Rajesh; E Berman Adam
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2020-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.