Literature DB >> 31262498

Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device.

Charlene L Rohm1, Bogdan Gadidov2, Michael Leitson3, Herman E Ray4, Rajnish Prasad5.   

Abstract

The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts) device is increasingly used for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to treat acute severe cardiogenic shock (CS). Initial and continued determination of the appropriate degree of MCS is challenging. This study evaluates predictors of mortality in patients treated with the Impella for acute severe CS and outcomes associated with prolonged Impella use. This retrospective single-center study included 204 patients treated with the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, or Impella 5.0 from 2011 to 2018 for acute severe CS. The primary end point was all-cause in-hospital mortality. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 45.1%. Nonsurvivors had a lower initial pH (7.24 vs 7.32, hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, p <0.0001), lower serum CO2 (19.1 vs 21.3 mmol/L, HR 1.08, p = 0.002), higher lactate (6.8 vs 3.3 mmol/L, HR 1.17, p <0.0001), and used a greater number of vasopressors and inotropes (4.3 vs 2.6, HR 1.44, p <0.0001). Patients with the Impella >4 days (n = 45) had a longer intensive care unit stay (12.6 vs 6.9 days, p <0.001), longer total hospital stay (16.4 vs 11.6 days, p = 0.03), longer mechanical ventilation use (7.8 vs 4.4 days, p = 0.002), and trend toward increased mortality (57.8 vs 41.5%, p = 0.051). In conclusion, in patients treated with the Impella for acute severe CS, initial biochemical parameters and need for vasopressors and inotropes are significant predictors of mortality that can serve as valuable indicators of whether the Impella or higher level of MCS is more appropriate. Patients treated with the Impella beyond 4 days have poorer outcomes and may benefit from escalation of care.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31262498     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes.

Authors:  Khaled Q A Abdullah; Jana V Roedler; Juergen Vom Dahl; Istvan Szendey; Hendrik Haake; Lars Eckardt; Albert Topf; Bernhard Ohnewein; Peter Jirak; Lukas J Motloch; Bernhard Wernly; Robert Larbig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Undergoing Impella CP Treatment vs. Standard of Care.

Authors:  Clemens Scherer; Enzo Lüsebrink; Danny Kupka; Thomas J Stocker; Konstantin Stark; Christopher Stremmel; Mathias Orban; Tobias Petzold; Antonia Germayer; Katharina Mauthe; Stefan Kääb; Julinda Mehilli; Daniel Braun; Hans Theiss; Stefan Brunner; Jörg Hausleiter; Steffen Massberg; Martin Orban
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Predictors of Short-term Survival in Cardiogenic Shock Patients Requiring Left Ventricular Support Using the Impella CP or 5.0.

Authors:  Vasileios Panoulas; María Monteagudo-Vela
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-03-16

4.  Vasoactive pharmacological management according to SCAI class in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nanna Louise Junker Udesen; Ole Kristian Lerche Helgestad; Jakob Josiassen; Christian Hassager; Henrik Frederiksen Højgaard; Louise Linde; Jesper Kjaergaard; Lene Holmvang; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Henrik Schmidt; Hanne Berg Ravn; Jacob Eifer Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Predicting mortality in cardiogenic shock secondary to ACS requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: The ACS-MCS score.

Authors:  Qussay Marashly; Iosif Taleb; Christos P Kyriakopoulos; Elizabeth Dranow; Tara L Jones; Anwar Tandar; Sean D Overton; Joseph E Tonna; Kathleen Stoddard; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Line Kemeyou; Antigone G Koliopoulou; Kevin S Shah; Kimiya Nourian; Tyler J Richins; Tyson S Burnham; Frederick G Welt; Stephen H McKellar; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Saeed Tarabichi; Hirohisa Ikegami; Mark J Russo; Leonard Y Lee; Anthony Lemaire
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.