Literature DB >> 33635880

Greenhouse gas reporting data improves understanding of regional climate impact on landfill methane production and collection.

Pradeep Jain1, James Wally1, Timothy G Townsend2, Max Krause3, Thabet Tolaymat3.   

Abstract

A critical examination of the US Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA's) Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) database provided an opportunity for the largest evaluation to date of landfilled waste decomposition kinetics with respect to different US climate regimes. In this paper, 5-8 years of annual methane collection data from 114 closed landfills located in 29 states were used to estimate site-specific waste decay rates (k) and methane collection potentials (Lc). These sites account for approximately 9% of all landfills required to report GHG emissions to the US EPA annually. The mean methane collection potential (Lc) for the sites located in regions with less than 635 mm (25 in) annual rainfall was significantly (p<0.002) lower than the mean methane collection potential of the sites located in regions with more than 635 mm (25 in) annual precipitation (49 and 73 m3 methane Mg-1 waste, respectively). This finding suggests that a fraction of the in-place biodegradable waste may not be decomposing, potentially due to a lack of adequate moisture content of landfills located in arid regions. The results of this evaluation offer insight that challenges assumptions of the traditional landfill methane estimation approach, especially in arid climates, that all methane corresponding to the total methane generation potential of the buried solid waste will be produced. Decay rates showed a significant correlation with annual precipitation, with an average k of 0.043 year-1 for arid regions (< 508 mm (20 in) year-1), 0.074 year-1 for regions with 508-1,016 mm (20-40 in) annual precipitation, and 0.09 year-1 in wet regions (> 1,016 mm (40 in) year-1). The data suggest that waste is decaying faster than the model default values, which in turn suggests that a larger fraction of methane is produced during a landfill's operating life (relative to post-closure).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33635880      PMCID: PMC7909644          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  16 in total

1.  Determination of first-order landfill gas modeling parameters and uncertainties.

Authors:  Hamid R Amini; Debra R Reinhart; Kevin R Mackie
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 7.145

2.  A logistic model for the prediction of the influence of water on the solid waste methanization in landfills.

Authors:  S Pommier; D Chenu; M Quintard; X Lefebvre
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Comparison of first-order-decay modeled and actual field measured municipal solid waste landfill methane data.

Authors:  Hamid R Amini; Debra R Reinhart; Antti Niskanen
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 4.  Controls on landfill gas collection efficiency: instantaneous and lifetime performance.

Authors:  Morton A Barlaz; Jeff P Chanton; Roger B Green
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Evaluation of landfill gas decay constant for municipal solid waste landfills operated as bioreactors.

Authors:  Thabet M Tolaymat; Roger B Green; Gary R Hater; Morton A Barlaz; Paul Black; Doug Bronson; Jon Powell
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  California's methane super-emitters.

Authors:  Riley M Duren; Andrew K Thorpe; Kelsey T Foster; Talha Rafiq; Francesca M Hopkins; Vineet Yadav; Brian D Bue; David R Thompson; Stephen Conley; Nadia K Colombi; Christian Frankenberg; Ian B McCubbin; Michael L Eastwood; Matthias Falk; Jorn D Herner; Bart E Croes; Robert O Green; Charles E Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Optimization of first order decay gas generation model parameters for landfills located in cold semi-arid climates.

Authors:  Hoang Lan Vu; Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng; Amy Richter
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 7.145

8.  Determination of as-discarded methane potential in residential and commercial municipal solid waste.

Authors:  Giles W Chickering; Max J Krause; Timothy G Townsend
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 7.145

9.  Using observed data to improve estimated methane collection from select U.S. landfills.

Authors:  Xiaoming Wang; Ajay S Nagpure; Joseph F DeCarolis; Morton A Barlaz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Methods for determining the methane generation potential and methane generation rate constant for the FOD model: a review.

Authors:  Jin-Kyu Park; Yong-Gil Chong; Kazuo Tameda; Nam-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2018-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.