Literature DB >> 20102038

Evaluation of landfill gas decay constant for municipal solid waste landfills operated as bioreactors.

Thabet M Tolaymat1, Roger B Green, Gary R Hater, Morton A Barlaz, Paul Black, Doug Bronson, Jon Powell.   

Abstract

Prediction of the rate of gas production from bioreactor landfills is important for the optimization of energy recovery and for estimating greenhouse gas emissions. To improve the predictability of gas production, landfill gas (LFG) composition and flow rates were monitored for 4 yr from one conventional and two bioreactor landfill cells at the Outer Loop Landfill in Louisville, KY. The ultimate methane yield (L(o)) was estimated from the biochemical methane (CH4) potential of freshly buried refuse and the decay rate constant (k) was estimated from measured CH4 collection. The site-specific L(o) was estimated to be 48.4 m3-CH4 wet Mg(-1). The estimated decay rate in the conventional cell (0.06 yr(-1)) was comparable to the AP-42 default value of 0.04 yr(-1), whereas estimates for the two bioreactor cells were substantially higher (approximately 0.11 yr(-1)). The data document the ability of the bioreactor operation to enhance landfill CH4 generation, although the estimated decay rate is sensitive to the selected L(o). The more rapid decomposition in the bioreactor cells reduces the length of time over which gas will be produced and emphasizes the importance of having a LFG collection system operational once the waste receives added moisture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20102038     DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.1.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  7 in total

1.  Alternative carbon dioxide modelling approaches accounting for high residual gases in LandGEM.

Authors:  Nathan Bruce; Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng; Amy Richter
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Methods for quantification of growth and productivity in anaerobic microbiology and biotechnology.

Authors:  Lisa-Maria Mauerhofer; Patricia Pappenreiter; Christian Paulik; Arne H Seifert; Sébastien Bernacchi; Simon K-M R Rittmann
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Use of seasonal parameters and their effects on FOD landfill gas modeling.

Authors:  Nathan Bruce; Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng; Hoang Lan Vu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Gas quantity and composition from the hydrolysis of salt cake from secondary aluminum processing.

Authors:  X-L Huang; T Tolaymat
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  CH4 mitigation potentials from China landfills and related environmental co-benefits.

Authors:  Bofeng Cai; Ziyang Lou; Jinnan Wang; Yong Geng; Joseph Sarkis; Jianguo Liu; Qingxian Gao
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Greenhouse gas reporting data improves understanding of regional climate impact on landfill methane production and collection.

Authors:  Pradeep Jain; James Wally; Timothy G Townsend; Max Krause; Thabet Tolaymat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Long-term groundwater protection efficiency of different types of sanitary landfills: Model description.

Authors:  Igor Madon; Darko Drev; Jakob Likar
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-02-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.