Literature DB >> 31695210

California's methane super-emitters.

Riley M Duren1,2, Andrew K Thorpe3, Kelsey T Foster3, Talha Rafiq4, Francesca M Hopkins4, Vineet Yadav3, Brian D Bue3, David R Thompson3, Stephen Conley5, Nadia K Colombi6, Christian Frankenberg3,7, Ian B McCubbin3, Michael L Eastwood3, Matthias Falk8, Jorn D Herner8, Bart E Croes8, Robert O Green3, Charles E Miller3.   

Abstract

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and is targeted for emissions mitigation by the US state of California and other jurisdictions worldwide1,2. Unique opportunities for mitigation are presented by point-source emitters-surface features or infrastructure components that are typically less than 10 metres in diameter and emit plumes of highly concentrated methane3. However, data on point-source emissions are sparse and typically lack sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to guide their mitigation and to accurately assess their magnitude4. Here we survey more than 272,000 infrastructure elements in California using an airborne imaging spectrometer that can rapidly map methane plumes5-7. We conduct five campaigns over several months from 2016 to 2018, spanning the oil and gas, manure-management and waste-management sectors, resulting in the detection, geolocation and quantification of emissions from 564 strong methane point sources. Our remote sensing approach enables the rapid and repeated assessment of large areas at high spatial resolution for a poorly characterized population of methane emitters that often appear intermittently and stochastically. We estimate net methane point-source emissions in California to be 0.618 teragrams per year (95 per cent confidence interval 0.523-0.725), equivalent to 34-46 per cent of the state's methane inventory8 for 2016. Methane 'super-emitter' activity occurs in every sector surveyed, with 10 per cent of point sources contributing roughly 60 per cent of point-source emissions-consistent with a study of the US Four Corners region that had a different sectoral mix9. The largest methane emitters in California are a subset of landfills, which exhibit persistent anomalous activity. Methane point-source emissions in California are dominated by landfills (41 per cent), followed by dairies (26 per cent) and the oil and gas sector (26 per cent). Our data have enabled the identification of the 0.2 per cent of California's infrastructure that is responsible for these emissions. Sharing these data with collaborating infrastructure operators has led to the mitigation of anomalous methane-emission activity10.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31695210     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1720-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  15 in total

1.  Large and seasonally varying biospheric CO2 fluxes in the Los Angeles megacity revealed by atmospheric radiocarbon.

Authors:  John B Miller; Scott J Lehman; Kristal R Verhulst; Charles E Miller; Riley M Duren; Vineet Yadav; Sally Newman; Christopher D Sloop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Climate Justice and California's Methane Superemitters: Environmental Equity Assessment of Community Proximity and Exposure Intensity.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Lara Cushing; Nicholas Depsky; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Coupled Air Quality and Boundary-Layer Meteorology in Western U.S. Basins during Winter: Design and Rationale for a Comprehensive Study.

Authors:  A Gannet Hallar; Steven S Brown; Erik Crosman; Kelley Barsanti; Christopher D Cappa; Ian Faloona; Jerome Fast; Heather A Holmes; John Horel; John Lin; Ann Middlebrook; Logan Mitchell; Jennifer Murphy; Caroline C Womack; Viney Aneja; Munkhbayar Baasandorj; Roya Bahreini; Robert Banta; Casey Bray; Alan Brewer; Dana Caulton; Joost de Gouw; Stephan F J De Wekker; Delphine K Farmer; Cassandra J Gaston; Sebastian Hoch; Francesca Hopkins; Nakul N Karle; James T Kelly; Kerry Kelly; Neil Lareau; Keding Lu; Roy L Mauldin; Derek V Mallia; Randal Martin; Daniel Mendoza; Holly J Oldroyd; Yelena Pichugina; Kerri A Pratt; Pablo Saide; Phillip J Silva; William Simpson; Britton B Stephens; Jochen Stutz; Amy Sullivan
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 9.116

4.  A multi-city urban atmospheric greenhouse gas measurement data synthesis.

Authors:  Logan E Mitchell; John C Lin; Lucy R Hutyra; David R Bowling; Ronald C Cohen; Kenneth J Davis; Elizabeth DiGangi; Riley M Duren; James R Ehleringer; Clayton Fain; Matthias Falk; Abhinav Guha; Anna Karion; Ralph F Keeling; Jooil Kim; Natasha L Miles; Charles E Miller; Sally Newman; Diane E Pataki; Steve Prinzivalli; Xinrong Ren; Andrew Rice; Scott J Richardson; Maryann Sargent; Britton B Stephens; Jocelyn C Turnbull; Kristal R Verhulst; Felix Vogel; Ray F Weiss; James Whetstone; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 8.501

5.  Greenhouse gas reporting data improves understanding of regional climate impact on landfill methane production and collection.

Authors:  Pradeep Jain; James Wally; Timothy G Townsend; Max Krause; Thabet Tolaymat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin.

Authors:  John C Lin; Ryan Bares; Benjamin Fasoli; Maria Garcia; Erik Crosman; Seth Lyman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change.

Authors:  Joshua L Laughner; Jessica L Neu; David Schimel; Paul O Wennberg; Kelley Barsanti; Kevin W Bowman; Abhishek Chatterjee; Bart E Croes; Helen L Fitzmaurice; Daven K Henze; Jinsol Kim; Eric A Kort; Zhu Liu; Kazuyuki Miyazaki; Alexander J Turner; Susan Anenberg; Jeremy Avise; Hansen Cao; David Crisp; Joost de Gouw; Annmarie Eldering; John C Fyfe; Daniel L Goldberg; Kevin R Gurney; Sina Hasheminassab; Francesca Hopkins; Cesunica E Ivey; Dylan B A Jones; Junjie Liu; Nicole S Lovenduski; Randall V Martin; Galen A McKinley; Lesley Ott; Benjamin Poulter; Muye Ru; Stanley P Sander; Neil Swart; Yuk L Yung; Zhao-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin.

Authors:  Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate; Luis Guanter; Yin-Nian Liu; Daniel J Varon; Joannes D Maasakkers; Yuzhong Zhang; Apisada Chulakadabba; Steven C Wofsy; Andrew K Thorpe; Riley M Duren; Christian Frankenberg; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Daniel H Cusworth; Yongguang Zhang; Karl Segl; Javier Gorroño; Elena Sánchez-García; Melissa P Sulprizio; Kaiqin Cao; Haijian Zhu; Jian Liang; Xun Li; Ilse Aben; Daniel J Jacob
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Enhanced Adsorptive Bioremediation of Heavy Metals (Cd2+, Cr6+, Pb2+) by Methane-Oxidizing Epipelon.

Authors:  Muhammad Faheem; Sadaf Shabbir; Jun Zhao; Philip G Kerr; Nasrin Sultana; Zhongjun Jia
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-01

10.  Atmospheric methane removal: a research agenda.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson; Sam Abernethy; Josep G Canadell; Matteo Cargnello; Steven J Davis; Sarah Féron; Sabine Fuss; Alexander J Heyer; Chaopeng Hong; Chris D Jones; H Damon Matthews; Fiona M O'Connor; Maxwell Pisciotta; Hannah M Rhoda; Renaud de Richter; Edward I Solomon; Jennifer L Wilcox; Kirsten Zickfeld
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.