Massimo Sacchetti1, Jonida Haxhi2, Paolo Sgrò3, Alessandro Scotto di Palumbo2, Andrea Nicolò2, Alessio Bellini2, Ilenia Bazzucchi2, Luigi di Luigi3. 1. Unit of Exercise Physiology, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro de Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy. massimo.sacchetti@uniroma4.it. 2. Unit of Exercise Physiology, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro de Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy. 3. Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Movement, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro de Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Exercise plays an important role in preventing and treating postprandial dysmetabolism. We investigated the postprandial metabolic responses to a standard lunch when a session of aerobic exercise is performed in the early postprandial phase or divided between the pre- and postprandial period. METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers consumed a standardised mixed lunch and rested for the following 3 h (Con) or performed 40 min of cycling at 65% V̇O2max after lunch (CPPEx), or two 20-min sessions, one before (SplitEx1) and the other after lunch (SplitEx2), at the same intensity. RESULTS: At 1-h post-lunch, a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in glycaemia was observed for CPPEx (- 25 ± 10%) and SplitEx (- 34 ± 7%) compared to Con. Yet, a post-exercise rebound lessened the exercise effect on the glycaemic area under the curve (AUC) at 2 and 3 h. At 1 h, a significant reduction (P < 0.009) in plasma insulin (SplitEx - 53 ± 31%; CCPEx - 48 ± 20%) and C-peptide (SplitEx - 57 ± 20%; CCPEx - 47 ± 24%) was observed compared to Con. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) increased after the meal, without differences between conditions. Compared with SplitEx1, cortisol response was attenuated during SplitEx2 and CPPEx. At 3 hours, triglyceride AUC was significantly higher (P = 0.039) in SplitEx compared to Con (+ 19 ± 8%). CONCLUSION: Forty minutes of postprandial exercise or 20 min of pre- and postprandial exercise are both effective at attenuating the glycaemic and insulinaemic response to a mixed lunch, while a higher lipaemia was found in the pre- and postprandrial exercise condition.
PURPOSE: Exercise plays an important role in preventing and treating postprandial dysmetabolism. We investigated the postprandial metabolic responses to a standard lunch when a session of aerobic exercise is performed in the early postprandial phase or divided between the pre- and postprandial period. METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers consumed a standardised mixed lunch and rested for the following 3 h (Con) or performed 40 min of cycling at 65% V̇O2max after lunch (CPPEx), or two 20-min sessions, one before (SplitEx1) and the other after lunch (SplitEx2), at the same intensity. RESULTS: At 1-h post-lunch, a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in glycaemia was observed for CPPEx (- 25 ± 10%) and SplitEx (- 34 ± 7%) compared to Con. Yet, a post-exercise rebound lessened the exercise effect on the glycaemic area under the curve (AUC) at 2 and 3 h. At 1 h, a significant reduction (P < 0.009) in plasma insulin (SplitEx - 53 ± 31%; CCPEx - 48 ± 20%) and C-peptide (SplitEx - 57 ± 20%; CCPEx - 47 ± 24%) was observed compared to Con. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) increased after the meal, without differences between conditions. Compared with SplitEx1, cortisol response was attenuated during SplitEx2 and CPPEx. At 3 hours, triglyceride AUC was significantly higher (P = 0.039) in SplitEx compared to Con (+ 19 ± 8%). CONCLUSION: Forty minutes of postprandial exercise or 20 min of pre- and postprandial exercise are both effective at attenuating the glycaemic and insulinaemic response to a mixed lunch, while a higher lipaemia was found in the pre- and postprandrial exercise condition.
Authors: Catherine R Mikus; Douglas J Oberlin; Jessica L Libla; Angelina M Taylor; Frank W Booth; John P Thyfault Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Feng Ning; Lei Zhang; Jacqueline M Dekker; Altan Onat; Coen D A Stehouwer; John S Yudkin; Tiina Laatikainen; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Kalevi Pyörälä; Qing Qiao Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 9.951