Literature DB >> 33634034

A Position Statement on the Utility of Interval Imaging in Standard of Care Brain Tumour Management: Defining the Evidence Gap and Opportunities for Future Research.

Thomas C Booth1,2, Gerard Thompson3, Helen Bulbeck4, Florien Boele5,6, Craig Buckley7, Jorge Cardoso1, Liane Dos Santos Canas1, David Jenkinson8, Keyoumars Ashkan9, Jack Kreindler10, Nicky Huskens11, Aysha Luis1,12, Catherine McBain13, Samantha J Mills14, Marc Modat1, Nick Morley15, Caroline Murphy16, Sebastian Ourselin1, Mark Pennington17, James Powell18, David Summers19, Adam D Waldman3, Colin Watts20,21, Matthew Williams22, Robin Grant3, Michael D Jenkinson23,24.   

Abstract

OBJECTIV E: To summarise current evidence for the utility of interval imaging in monitoring disease in adult brain tumours, and to develop a position for future evidence gathering while incorporating the application of data science and health economics.
METHODS: Experts in 'interval imaging' (imaging at pre-planned time-points to assess tumour status); data science; health economics, trial management of adult brain tumours, and patient representatives convened in London, UK. The current evidence on the use of interval imaging for monitoring brain tumours was reviewed. To improve the evidence that interval imaging has a role in disease management, we discussed specific themes of data science, health economics, statistical considerations, patient and carer perspectives, and multi-centre study design. Suggestions for future studies aimed at filling knowledge gaps were discussed.
RESULTS: Meningioma and glioma were identified as priorities for interval imaging utility analysis. The "monitoring biomarkers" most commonly used in adult brain tumour patients were standard structural MRI features. Interval imaging was commonly scheduled to provide reported imaging prior to planned, regular clinic visits. There is limited evidence relating interval imaging in the absence of clinical deterioration to management change that alters morbidity, mortality, quality of life, or resource use. Progression-free survival is confounded as an outcome measure when using structural MRI in glioma. Uncertainty from imaging causes distress for some patients and their caregivers, while for others it provides an important indicator of disease activity. Any study design that changes imaging regimens should consider the potential for influencing current or planned therapeutic trials, ensure that opportunity costs are measured, and capture indirect benefits and added value.
CONCLUSION: Evidence for the value, and therefore utility, of regular interval imaging is currently lacking. Ongoing collaborative efforts will improve trial design and generate the evidence to optimise monitoring imaging biomarkers in standard of care brain tumour management.
Copyright © 2021 Booth, Thompson, Bulbeck, Boele, Buckley, Cardoso, Dos Santos Canas, Jenkinson, Ashkan, Kreindler, Huskens, Luis, McBain, Mills, Modat, Morley, Murphy, Ourselin, Pennington, Powell, Summers, Waldman, Watts, Williams, Grant and Jenkinson.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glioblastoma; glioma; high grade glioma; interval imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; meningioma; monitoring biomarker; utility

Year:  2021        PMID: 33634034      PMCID: PMC7900557          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  75 in total

1.  Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Daniel C Sullivan; Nancy A Obuchowski; Larry G Kessler; David L Raunig; Constantine Gatsonis; Erich P Huang; Marina Kondratovich; Lisa M McShane; Anthony P Reeves; Daniel P Barboriak; Alexander R Guimaraes; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Criteria for evaluating patients undergoing chemotherapy for malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  V A Levin; D C Crafts; D M Norman; P B Hoffer; J P Spire; C B Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial.

Authors:  Vinai Gondi; Stephanie L Pugh; Wolfgang A Tome; Chip Caine; Ben Corn; Andrew Kanner; Howard Rowley; Vijayananda Kundapur; Albert DeNittis; Jeffrey N Greenspoon; Andre A Konski; Glenn S Bauman; Sunjay Shah; Wenyin Shi; Merideth Wendland; Lisa Kachnic; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Mei-Yin Polley; Michael W McDermott; Andrew T Parsa; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Time window for postoperative reactive enhancement after resection of brain tumors: less than 72 hours.

Authors:  Stephanie Lescher; Sonja Schniewindt; Alina Jurcoane; Christian Senft; Elke Hattingen
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Treatment for Multiple Acute Cardiopulmonary Conditions in Older Adults Hospitalized with Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kumar Dharmarajan; Kelly M Strait; Mary E Tinetti; Tara Lagu; Peter K Lindenauer; Joanne Lynn; Michelle R Krukas; Frank R Ernst; Shu-Xia Li; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study.

Authors:  Masaaki Yamamoto; Toru Serizawa; Takashi Shuto; Atsuya Akabane; Yoshinori Higuchi; Jun Kawagishi; Kazuhiro Yamanaka; Yasunori Sato; Hidefumi Jokura; Shoji Yomo; Osamu Nagano; Hiroyuki Kenai; Akihito Moriki; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihisa Kida; Yoshiyasu Iwai; Motohiro Hayashi; Hiroaki Onishi; Masazumi Gondo; Mitsuya Sato; Tomohide Akimitsu; Kenji Kubo; Yasuhiro Kikuchi; Toru Shibasaki; Tomoaki Goto; Masami Takanashi; Yoshimasa Mori; Kintomo Takakura; Naokatsu Saeki; Etsuo Kunieda; Hidefumi Aoyama; Suketaka Momoshima; Kazuhiro Tsuchiya
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology: a report of the RANO working group.

Authors:  Hideho Okada; Michael Weller; Raymond Huang; Gaetano Finocchiaro; Mark R Gilbert; Wolfgang Wick; Benjamin M Ellingson; Naoya Hashimoto; Ian F Pollack; Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Christel Herold-Mende; Lakshmi Nayak; Ashok Panigrahy; Whitney B Pope; Robert Prins; John H Sampson; Patrick Y Wen; David A Reardon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 10.  Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Rudie; Andreas M Rauschecker; R Nick Bryan; Christos Davatzikos; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 1: Perfusion and Diffusion Techniques.

Authors:  Otto M Henriksen; María Del Mar Álvarez-Torres; Patricia Figueiredo; Gilbert Hangel; Vera C Keil; Ruben E Nechifor; Frank Riemer; Kathleen M Schmainda; Esther A H Warnert; Evita C Wiegers; Thomas C Booth
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Imaging Biomarkers of Glioblastoma Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Machine Learning Studies.

Authors:  Thomas C Booth; Mariusz Grzeda; Alysha Chelliah; Andrei Roman; Ayisha Al Busaidi; Carmen Dragos; Haris Shuaib; Aysha Luis; Ayesha Mirchandani; Burcu Alparslan; Nina Mansoor; Jose Lavrador; Francesco Vergani; Keyoumars Ashkan; Marc Modat; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 2: Spectroscopy, Chemical Exchange Saturation, Multiparametric Imaging, and Radiomics.

Authors:  Thomas C Booth; Evita C Wiegers; Esther A H Warnert; Kathleen M Schmainda; Frank Riemer; Ruben E Nechifor; Vera C Keil; Gilbert Hangel; Patrícia Figueiredo; Maria Del Mar Álvarez-Torres; Otto M Henriksen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Conor S Gillespie; Emily R Bligh; Michael T C Poon; Georgios Solomou; Abdurrahman I Islim; Mohammad A Mustafa; Ola Rominiyi; Sophie T Williams; Neeraj Kalra; Ryan K Mathew; Thomas C Booth; Gerard Thompson; Paul M Brennan; Michael D Jenkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Establishing Imaging Biomarkers of Host Immune System Efficacy during Glioblastoma Therapy Response: Challenges, Obstacles and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ana Paula Candiota; Carles Arús
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-03-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.