Literature DB >> 26267831

Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers.

Daniel C Sullivan1, Nancy A Obuchowski1, Larry G Kessler1, David L Raunig1, Constantine Gatsonis1, Erich P Huang1, Marina Kondratovich1, Lisa M McShane1, Anthony P Reeves1, Daniel P Barboriak1, Alexander R Guimaraes1, Richard L Wahl1.   

Abstract

Although investigators in the imaging community have been active in developing and evaluating quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs), the development and implementation of QIBs have been hampered by the inconsistent or incorrect use of terminology or methods for technical performance and statistical concepts. Technical performance is an assessment of how a test performs in reference objects or subjects under controlled conditions. In this article, some of the relevant statistical concepts are reviewed, methods that can be used for evaluating and comparing QIBs are described, and some of the technical performance issues related to imaging biomarkers are discussed. More consistent and correct use of terminology and study design principles will improve clinical research, advance regulatory science, and foster better care for patients who undergo imaging studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26267831      PMCID: PMC4666097          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.

Authors:  S S Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1946-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Bring on the biomarkers.

Authors:  George Poste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Accuracy and precision of radioactivity quantification in nuclear medicine images.

Authors:  Eric C Frey; John L Humm; Michael Ljungberg
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET.

Authors:  W A Weber; S I Ziegler; R Thödtmann; A R Hanauske; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Monitoring the progress of emphysema by repeat computed tomography scans with focus on noise reduction.

Authors:  Asger Dirksen
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-12-15

Review 8.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Anthony P Reeves; Erich P Huang; Xiao-Feng Wang; Andrew J Buckler; Hyun J Grace Kim; Huiman X Barnhart; Edward F Jackson; Maryellen L Giger; Gene Pennello; Alicia Y Toledano; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle J Myers; Dmitry B Goldgof; Daniel P Barboriak; Robert J Gillies; Lawrence H Schwartz; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Quantification of iron concentration in the liver by MRI.

Authors:  José María Alústiza Echeverría; Agustín Castiella; José Ignacio Emparanza
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-12-30

10.  ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-02-09
View more
  120 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI. A feasibility study with a semi-automatic and automatic software compared to observer-based scores.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Bianca Bignotti; Giulio Tagliafico; Simona Tosto; Alessio Signori; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Perfusion MRI as the predictive/prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab: a systematic review and a time-to-event meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Choi; Seung Chai Jung; Kyung Won Kim; Ja Youn Lee; Yoonseok Choi; Seong Ho Park; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  A multiscale Mueller polarimetry module for a stereo zoom microscope.

Authors:  Adam Gribble; Michael A Pinkert; Jared Westreich; Yuming Liu; Adib Keikhosravi; Mohammadali Khorasani; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Kevin W Eliceiri; Alex Vitkin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2019-06-20

Review 4.  Neuroimaging in Psychiatry and Neurodevelopment: why the emperor has no clothes.

Authors:  Ashley N Anderson; Jace B King; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia.

Authors:  Olivia Goodkin; Hugh Pemberton; Sjoerd B Vos; Ferran Prados; Carole H Sudre; James Moggridge; M Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Sotirios Bisdas; Mark White; Tarek Yousry; John Thornton; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Task-dependence of articulator synergies.

Authors:  Tanner Sorensen; Asterios Toutios; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  [Diffusion-weighted imaging-diagnostic supplement or alternative to contrast agents in early detection of malignancies?]

Authors:  S Bickelhaupt; C Dreher; F König; K Deike-Hofmann; D Paech; H P Schlemmer; T A Kuder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Magician's Corner: 4. Image Segmentation with U-Net.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson; Jason Cai
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-01-29

9.  Quantitative effects of acquisition duration and temporal resolution on the measurement accuracy of prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data: a phantom study.

Authors:  Silvin Paul Knight; Jacinta Elizabeth Browne; James Frances Mary Meaney; Andrew John Fagan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.