Literature DB >> 33633366

Role of percutaneous vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement in the treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Kunpeng Li1, Changbin Ji1, Dawei Luo1, Wen Zhang2, Hongyong Feng1, Keshi Yang1, Hui Xu3.   

Abstract

Severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) were considered as relative or even absolute contraindication for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty and these relevant reports are very limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement and conventional kyphoplasty in managing severe OVCFs. 37 patients of severe OVCFs experiencing vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty were reviewed and divided into two groups, according to the procedural technique, 18 in high-viscosity cement percutaneous vertebroplasty (hPVP) group and 19 in conventional percutaneous kyphoplasty (cPKP) group. The operative time, and injected bone cement volume were recorded. Anterior vertebral height (AVH), Cobb angle and cement leakage were also evaluated in the radiograph. The rate of cement leakage was lower in hPVP group, compared with cPKP group (16.7% vs 47.4%, P = 0.046). The patients in cPKP group achieved more improvement in AVH and Cobb angle than those in hPVP group postoperatively (37.2 ± 7.9% vs 43.0 ± 8.9% for AVH, P = 0.044; 15.5 ± 4.7 vs 12.7 ± 3.3, for Cobb angle, P = 0.042). At one year postoperatively, there was difference observed in AVH between two groups (34.1 ± 7.4 vs 40.5 ± 8.7 for hPVP and cPKP groups, P = 0.021), but no difference was found in Cobb angle (16.6 ± 5.0 vs 13.8 ± 3.8, P = 0.068). Similar cement volume was injected in two groups (2.9 ± 0.5 ml vs 2.8 ± 0.6 ml, P = 0.511). However, the operative time was 37.8 ± 6.8 min in the hPVP group, which was shorter than that in the cPKP group (43.8 ± 8.2 min, P = 0.021). In conclusion, conventional PKP achieved better in restoring anterior vertebral height and improving kyphotic angle, but PVP with high-viscosity cement had lower rate of cement leakage and shorter operative time with similar volume of injected cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633366      PMCID: PMC7907187          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84314-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  26 in total

1.  Clinical experience with high-viscosity cements for percutaneous vertebral body augmentation: occurrence, degree, and location of cement leakage compared with kyphoplasty.

Authors:  B A Georgy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Comparing complications of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the randomized and non-randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Haixiang Xiao; Jiandong Yang; Xinming Feng; Pengtao Chen; Yinan Li; Cheng Huang; Yuan Liang; Hongzhou Chen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-03

3.  A comparison of high viscosity bone cement and low viscosity bone cement vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Jingcheng Wang; Xinmin Feng; Yuping Tao; Jiandong Yang; Yongxiang Wang; Shengfei Zhang; Jun Cai; Jijun Huang
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  An evaluation of the functional and radiological results of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for acute symptomatic osteoporotic spinal fractures.

Authors:  Hüseyin Balkarli; Mesut Kilic; Ayşe Balkarli; Murat Erdogan
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 5.  Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Authors:  G Zhao; X Liu; F Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Hua Guo; Li Yuan; Dageng Huang; Haiping Zhang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of high-viscosity cement vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Cheng-hu Wang; Jin-zhu Ma; Chuan-chen Zhang; Lin Nie
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8.  The major complications of transpedicular vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Murat Cosar; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Tuncay Kaner; Omur Ercelen; K Cagri Kose; A Fahir Ozer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-11

9.  Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  William Clark; Paul Bird; Peter Gonski; Terrence H Diamond; Peter Smerdely; H Patrick McNeil; Glen Schlaphoff; Carl Bryant; Elizabeth Barnes; Val Gebski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Lee; Hae-Won Jeong; Il-Han Joo; Young-Il Ko; Chang-Nam Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of cement distribution type on clinical outcome after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the aging population.

Authors:  Chengqiang Zhou; Yifeng Liao; Shaolong Huang; Hua Li; Ziqiang Zhu; Li Zheng; Bin Wang; Yunqing Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.