Literature DB >> 26922648

An evaluation of the functional and radiological results of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for acute symptomatic osteoporotic spinal fractures.

Hüseyin Balkarli1, Mesut Kilic2, Ayşe Balkarli3, Murat Erdogan4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the results of the two different treatment regimens (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and conservative treatment (CT)) regarding to efficacy, quality of life, functional and radiological results in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVF).
METHODS: The study comprised 83 patients who presented with complaints of OVF associated with osteoporosis and were treated with CT (37) or PV (46). All patients were evaluated according to preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and plain radiographs.
RESULTS: All patients in VP group reported a significant decrease in pain at 1st day postoperative. While Pain relief and functional outcomes were significantly better in PV group than CT at 1st and 3rd months according to VAS and ODI scores, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups at 6th months follow-up. The mean preoperative local sagittal Cobb angle (LSCA) and the mean vertebra corpus mid-level height (MVCH) were 42.3° and 14.6 mm in the PV group, while they were measured as 39.8° and 15.7 mm in CT group, respectively. 15.6° decreasing the LSCA and 10.2 mm increasing MVCH were noted in the PV group at the 6th month follow-up. While LSCA increased 19.1° and MVCH decreased 7.6mm in CT group at same time period (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CT group, PV provides a rapid decrease of pain and an early return to daily life activities. Although improvement was observed on the radiological findings following treatment in the PV group, PV may not enhance the quality of life in patients with acute OVF at 6th months follow up.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; Conservative treatment; Kyphosis; Percutaneous vertebroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26922648     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

1.  Vertebral augmentation reduces the 12-month mortality and morbidity in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Teodora Bellone; Marco Scardapane; Pierre De Marini; Pierre-Alexis Autrusseau; Pierre Auloge; Julien Garnon; Jack W Jennings; Afshin Gangi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Treatment-Related Decision Making for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Cong Jin; Guojian Xu; Dong Weng; Minghua Xie; Yu Qian
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-01-03

3.  Vertebral collapse and polymethylmethacrylate breakage after vertebroplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Anquan Huang; Shenyun Fang; Liyu Wang; Renjie Xu; Jun Shen; Guoqing Zhu; Ye Miao; Tianming Zou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Influence of vertebral bone mineral density on total dispersion volume of bone cement in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Zhenghua Liu; Jing Luo; Liqun Gong; Yaqing Cui; Qichun Song; Pei Fen Xiao; Yongchun Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Role of percutaneous vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement in the treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Kunpeng Li; Changbin Ji; Dawei Luo; Wen Zhang; Hongyong Feng; Keshi Yang; Hui Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture accompanied with thoracolumbar fascial injury: risk factors and the association with residual pain after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Yang Luo; Tianyu Jiang; Hui Guo; Faqin Lv; Ying Hu; Lihai Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Bone Cement (Spinofill®) for Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporotic Compression Fracture : A Preliminary Prospective Study.

Authors:  Han Byeol Park; Seong Son; Jong Myung Jung; Sang Gu Lee; Byung Rhae Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-05-17

8.  Association of early vertebroplasty with risk of hip replacement: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chiao-Zhu Li; Chiao-Ching Li; Chi-Tun Tang; Chi-Hsiang Chung; Chien-Yu Ou; Chun-Lin Chen; Nan-Fu Chen; Tzu-Tsao Chung; Dueng-Yuan Hueng; Hsin-I Ma; Ming-Ying Liu; Yuan-Hao Chen; Wu-Chien Chien; Da-Tong Ju
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Efficacy and safety of high-viscosity cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kunpeng Li; Hongyong Feng; Dawei Luo; Wen Zhang; Keshi Yang; Changbin Ji; Jinlong Liu; Hui Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Therapeutic effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty and nonoperative treatment on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Dongliang Wang; Dingwei Cang; Ya Wu; Siqing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.