Literature DB >> 33627826

A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study.

Kouji Izumi1, Takashi Shima2, Kazuyoshi Shigehara3,4, Kiyoshi Sawada5, Renato Naito3,6, Yuki Kato3,7, Mitsuo Ofude4,8, Hiroshi Kano3,9, Hiroaki Iwamoto3, Hiroshi Yaegashi3,4, Kazufumi Nakashima3, Masashi Iijima3, Shohei Kawaguchi3,2, Takahiro Nohara3,2, Yoshifumi Kadono3, Atsushi Mizokami3.   

Abstract

Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33627826      PMCID: PMC7904864          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  16 in total

Review 1.  Use of percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting in management of ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Linda Hsu; Hanhan Li; Daniel Pucheril; Moritz Hansen; Raymond Littleton; James Peabody; Jesse Sammon
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

2.  Nonoperative urinary diversion for malignant ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  J A Zadra; M A Jewett; A G Keresteci; J T Rankin; E St Louis; R R Grey; J J Pereira
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Outcome of palliative urinary diversion in the treatment of advanced malignancies.

Authors:  B Shekarriz; H Shekarriz; J Upadhyay; M Banerjee; H Becker; J E Pontes; D P Wood
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Stent-change therapy in advanced malignancies with ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Bradley H Rosenberg; Fernando J Bianco; David P Wood; Jeffrey A Triest
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Endoscopic Management of Ureteral Strictures: an Update.

Authors:  Jacob W Lucas; Eric Ghiraldi; Jeffrey Ellis; Justin I Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Long-Term Percutaneous Nephrostomy Management of Malignant Urinary Obstruction: Estimation of Optimal Exchange Frequency and Estimation of the Financial Impact of Patient Compliance.

Authors:  Joseph L McDevitt; Stefany Acosta-Torres; Ning Zhang; Tianshen Hu; Ayobami Odu; Jijia Wang; Yin Xi; Daniel Lamus; David S Miller; Anil K Pillai
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  A prognostic model for survival after palliative urinary diversion for malignant ureteric obstruction: a prospective study of 208 patients.

Authors:  Maurício D Cordeiro; Rafael F Coelho; Daher C Chade; Rodrigo R Pessoa; Mateus S Chaib; José R Colombo-Júnior; José Pontes-Júnior; Giuliano B Guglielmetti; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with internal ureteral stent placement for malignant extrinsic ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Hiroshi Matsuura; Shigeki Arase; Yasuhide Hori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Prognostic model for predicting survival after palliative urinary diversion for ureteral obstruction: analysis of 140 cases.

Authors:  Junichiro Ishioka; Yukio Kageyama; Masaharu Inoue; Yotsuo Higashi; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prognostic marker for patients with malignant ureter obstruction.

Authors:  Takeshi Azuma; Yasushi Nagase; Masaya Oshi
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.