| Literature DB >> 26981442 |
Linda Hsu1, Hanhan Li1, Daniel Pucheril1, Moritz Hansen1, Raymond Littleton1, James Peabody1, Jesse Sammon1.
Abstract
The management options for ureteral obstruction are diverse, including retrograde ureteral stent insertion or antegrade nephrostomy placement, with or without eventual antegrade stent insertion. There is currently no consensus on the ideal treatment or treatment pathway for ureteral obstruction owing, in part, to the varied etiologies of obstruction and diversity of institutional practices. Additionally, different clinicians such as internists, urologists, oncologists and radiologists are often involved in the care of patients with ureteral obstruction and may have differing opinions concerning the best management strategy. The purpose of this manuscript was to review available literature that compares percutaneous nephrostomy placement vs ureteral stenting in the management of ureteral obstruction from both benign and malignant etiologies.Entities:
Keywords: Pelvic malignancy; Percutaneous nephrostomy; Quality of life; Ureteral obstruction; Ureteral stents; Urinary diversion; Urinary drainage
Year: 2016 PMID: 26981442 PMCID: PMC4777789 DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Nephrol ISSN: 2220-6124