Literature DB >> 33626036

On the evolution and development of morphological complexity: A view from gene regulatory networks.

Pascal F Hagolani1, Roland Zimm1,2,3, Renske Vroomans4,5, Isaac Salazar-Ciudad1,6,7.   

Abstract

How does morphological complexity evolve? This study suggests that the likelihood of mutations increasing phenotypic complexity becomes smaller when the phenotype itself is complex. In addition, the complexity of the genotype-phenotype map (GPM) also increases with the phenotypic complexity. We show that complex GPMs and the above mutational asymmetry are inevitable consequences of how genes need to be wired in order to build complex and robust phenotypes during development. We randomly wired genes and cell behaviors into networks in EmbryoMaker. EmbryoMaker is a mathematical model of development that can simulate any gene network, all animal cell behaviors (division, adhesion, apoptosis, etc.), cell signaling, cell and tissues biophysics, and the regulation of those behaviors by gene products. Through EmbryoMaker we simulated how each random network regulates development and the resulting morphology (i.e. a specific distribution of cells and gene expression in 3D). This way we obtained a zoo of possible 3D morphologies. Real gene networks are not random, but a random search allows a relatively unbiased exploration of what is needed to develop complex robust morphologies. Compared to the networks leading to simple morphologies, the networks leading to complex morphologies have the following in common: 1) They are rarer; 2) They need to be finely tuned; 3) Mutations in them tend to decrease morphological complexity; 4) They are less robust to noise; and 5) They have more complex GPMs. These results imply that, when complexity evolves, it does so at a progressively decreasing rate over generations. This is because as morphological complexity increases, the likelihood of mutations increasing complexity decreases, morphologies become less robust to noise, and the GPM becomes more complex. We find some properties in common, but also some important differences, with non-developmental GPM models (e.g. RNA, protein and gene networks in single cells).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33626036      PMCID: PMC7939363          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  72 in total

1.  Evolution of biological complexity.

Authors:  C Adami; C Ofria; T C Collier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A gene network model accounting for development and evolution of mammalian teeth.

Authors:  Isaac Salazar-Ciudad; Jukka Jernvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How different types of pattern formation mechanisms affect the evolution of form and development.

Authors:  Isaac Salazar-Ciudad; Jukka Jernvall
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 5.  Dynamical patterning modules: a "pattern language" for development and evolution of multicellular form.

Authors:  Stuart A Newman; Ramray Bhat
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.203

6.  Tree thinking for all biology: the problem with reading phylogenies as ladders of progress.

Authors:  Kevin E Omland; Lyn G Cook; Michael D Crisp
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding.

Authors:  H Li; R Helling; C Tang; N Wingreen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  AN EXPLANATION FOR COPE'S RULE.

Authors:  Steven M Stanley
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Developmental stability and instability.

Authors:  B L Shapiro
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1971 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 10.  Positional information and pattern formation.

Authors:  L Wolpert
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  5 in total

1.  Correction: On the evolution and development of morphological complexity: A view from gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Pascal F Hagolani; Roland Zimm; Renske Vroomans; Isaac Salazar-Ciudad
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 2.  Using phenotypic plasticity to understand the structure and evolution of the genotype-phenotype map.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Christelle Leung; Arnaud Le Rouzic; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 1.633

3.  Computational modeling and analysis of the morphogenetic domain signaling networks regulating C. elegans embryogenesis.

Authors:  Ben Niu; Thao Nguyen Bach; Xingyu Chen; Khyati Raghunath Chandratre; John Isaac Murray; Zhongying Zhao; Michael Zhang
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.155

4.  Reply to Ocklenburg and Mundorf: The interplay of developmental bias and natural selection.

Authors:  Iain G Johnston; Kamaludin Dingle; Sam F Greenbury; Chico Q Camargo; Jonathan P K Doye; Sebastian E Ahnert; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Symmetry and simplicity spontaneously emerge from the algorithmic nature of evolution.

Authors:  Iain G Johnston; Kamaludin Dingle; Sam F Greenbury; Chico Q Camargo; Jonathan P K Doye; Sebastian E Ahnert; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 12.779

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.