Literature DB >> 33625375

The Epidemiology of Patients' Email Addresses in a French University Hospital: Case-Control Study.

Vincent Looten1,2,3, Antoine Neuraz2,3,4, Nicolas Garcelon2,5, Anita Burgun1,2,3,4, Gilles Chatellier1, Bastien Rance1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals are caught between the wish of patients to speed up health-related communication via emails and the need for protecting health information.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the demographic characteristics of patients providing an email, and study the distribution of emails' domain names.
METHODS: We used the information system of the European Hospital Georges Pompidou (HEGP) to identify patients who provided an email address. We used a 1:1 matching strategy to study the demographic characteristics of the patients associated with the presence of an email, and described the characteristics of the emails used (in terms of types of emails-free, business, and personal).
RESULTS: Overall, 4.22% (41,004/971,822) of the total population of patients provided an email address. The year of last contact with the patient is the strongest driver of the presence of an email address (odds ratio [OR] 20.8, 95% CI 18.9-22.9). Patients more likely to provide an email address were treated for chronic conditions and were more likely born between 1950 and 1969 (taking patients born before 1950 as reference [OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.54-1.67], and compared to those born after 1990 [OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.53-0.59]). Of the 41,004 email addresses collected, 37,779 were associated with known email providers, 31,005 email addresses were associated with Google, Microsoft, Orange, and Yahoo!, 2878 with business emails addresses, and 347 email addresses with personalized domain names.
CONCLUSIONS: Emails have been collected only recently in our institution. The importance of the year of last contact probably reflects this recent change in contact information collection policy. The demographic characteristics and especially the age distribution are likely the result of a population bias in the hospital: patients providing email are more likely to be treated for chronic diseases. A risk analysis of the use of email revealed several situations that could constitute a breach of privacy that is both likely and with major consequences. Patients treated for chronic diseases are more likely to provide an email address, and are also more at risk in case of privacy breach. Several common situations could expose their private information. We recommend a very restrictive use of the emails for health communication. ©Vincent Looten, Antoine Neuraz, Nicolas Garcelon, Anita Burgun, Gilles Chatellier, Bastien Rance. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 24.02.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data privacy; email; health communication

Year:  2021        PMID: 33625375      PMCID: PMC7946586          DOI: 10.2196/13992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  10 in total

1.  The HEGP component-based clinical information system.

Authors:  Patrice Degoulet; Lise Marin; Marion Lavril; Christel Le Bozec; Elisabeth Delbecke; Jean-Jacques Meaux; Lionel Rose
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Methodology of integration of a clinical data warehouse with a clinical information system: the HEGP case.

Authors:  Eric Zapletal; Nicolas Rodon; Natalia Grabar; Patrice Degoulet
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

3.  New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Vijaya Sundararajan; Toni Henderson; Catherine Perry; Amanda Muggivan; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The Georges Pompidou University Hospital Clinical Data Warehouse: A 8-years follow-up experience.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Jannot; Eric Zapletal; Paul Avillach; Marie-France Mamzer; Anita Burgun; Patrice Degoulet
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Usability Assessment of Secure Messaging for Clinical Document Sharing between Health Care Providers and Patients.

Authors:  Michelle A Jahn; Brian W Porter; Himalaya Patel; Alan J Zillich; Steven R Simon; Alissa L Russ
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Patient Use of Email, Facebook, and Physician Websites to Communicate with Physicians: A National Online Survey of Retail Pharmacy Users.

Authors:  Joy L Lee; Niteesh K Choudhry; Albert W Wu; Olga S Matlin; Troyen A Brennan; William H Shrank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient use of email for health care communication purposes across 14 European countries: an analysis of users according to demographic and health-related factors.

Authors:  Nikki Newhouse; Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva; Cristiano Codagnone; Helen Atherton
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Older patients' enthusiasm to use electronic mail to communicate with their physicians: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Sarah A Fox; Nancy J Petersen; Anila Shethia; Richard L Street
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Physicians' use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices.

Authors:  Robert G Brooks; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.