Literature DB >> 33624472

[Clinical application of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities].

Bi Wu1, Yue Wang2, Peng Hao2, Junwei Feng2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the feasibility and accuracy of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities.
METHODS: Between July 2016 and February 2017, 20 patients with severe knee joint osteoarthritis planned to undergo primary TKA were selected as the research object. There were 9 males and 11 females; aged 53-84 years, with an average of 69.4 years. The body mass index was 22.1-31.0 kg/m 2, with an average of 24.8 kg/m 2. The preoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint was (103.0±19.4)°, the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 5.4±1.3, and the American Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) score was 58.1±11.3. Before operation, a three-dimensional model of the knee joint was constructed based on the full-length X-ray film of lower extremities and CT of the knee joint. The distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide was designed and fabricated, and the thickness of the distal femoral osteotomy was determined by digital simulation. The thickness of the internal and external condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy were compared. The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage loss, and hidden blood loss were recorded. The ROM of knee joint, VAS score, and HSS score at 3 months after operation were recorded to evaluate effectiveness. The position of the coronal and sagittal plane of the distal femoral prosthesis were assessed by comparing the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMAA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical femoral tibial angle (mFTA), distal femoral flexion angle (DFFA), femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), anatomical lateral femoral component angle (aLFC), and the angle of the femoral component and femoral shaft (α angle) between pre- and post-operation.
RESULTS: TKA was successfully completed with the aid of the distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide. There was no significant difference between the thickness of the internal and lateral condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 3 months. All incisions healed by first intention, and there was no complications such as periarticular infection and deep vein thrombosis. Except for 1 patient who was not treated with tranexamic acid, the intraoperative blood loss of the rest 19 patients ranged from 30 to 150 mL, with an average of 73.2 mL; the postoperative drainage loss ranged from 20 to 500 mL, with an average of 154.5 mL; and the hidden blood loss ranged from 169.2 to 1 400.0 mL, with an average of 643.8 mL. At 3 months after operation, the ROM of the knee was (111.5±11.5)°, and there was no significant difference when compared with the preoperative one ( t=-1.962, P=0.065). The VAS score was 2.4±0.9 and HSS score was 88.2±7.5, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative ones ( t=7.248, P=0.000; t=-11.442, P=0.000). Compared with the preoperative measurements, there was a significant difference in mFTA ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in aLDFA, FMAA, or DFFA; compared with the preoperative plan, there was no significant difference in FPFA, aLFC, or α angle ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The use of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremity can achieve precise osteotomy, improve coronal and sagittal limb alignment, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and obtain satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Patient-specific cutting guide; femoral osteotomy; full-length X-ray film of lower extremity; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33624472      PMCID: PMC8171691          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202008113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  26 in total

1.  The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William M Mihalko; James Boyle; Lindsey D Clark; Kenneth A Krackow
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  J Bohannon Mason; Thomas K Fehring; Rhonda Estok; Deirdre Banel; Kyle Fahrbach
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang-Dong Wu; Bing-Yan Xiang; Martijn G M Schotanus; Zun-Han Liu; Yu Chen; Wei Huang
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 4.  Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pramod B Voleti; Mathew J Hamula; Keith D Baldwin; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Improved tibial component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system.

Authors:  Yoon Whan Roh; Tae Woo Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Why knees fail in 2011: patient, surgeon, or device?

Authors:  Steven J Fitzgerald; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.

Authors:  J S Church; J E Scadden; R R Gupta; C Cokis; K A Williams; G C Janes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04

9.  Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data.

Authors:  Andrzej Kotela; Jacek Lorkowski; Marek Kucharzewski; Magdalena Wilk-Frańczuk; Zbigniew Śliwiński; Bogusław Frańczuk; Paweł Łęgosz; Ireneusz Kotela
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kirill Gromov; Mounim Korchi; Morten G Thomsen; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.