Literature DB >> 21902148

Why knees fail in 2011: patient, surgeon, or device?

Steven J Fitzgerald1, Robert T Trousdale.   

Abstract

The outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is influenced by multiple interconnected factors, including patient selection, implant design, and surgical technique. Total knee arthroplasty has been shown to be highly successful, with patient satisfaction rates reported from 85% to 95% with low rates of failure, but if failure occurs, its impact is significant. In 2003, 402,000 primary TKAs and 32,000 revision TKAs were performed in the United States, and the number of TKAs is expected to double by 2015. Recent data on modern implant designs and techniques have demonstrated a surprising number of early failures, although the true number of early failures is unknown. Patient medical comorbidities should be optimized preoperatively, while psychosocial issues and workers compensation are more nebulous yet contribute greatly to patient perceived outcomes. Understanding current failure mechanisms of primary TKA and how to prevent complications will be critical to help manage a potentially overwhelming TKA revision burden. This article discusses failure rates as well as factors from the patient, surgeon, and device, that contribute to TKA failure. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21902148     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  9 in total

1.  See the whole picture: knee preserving therapy needs more than surface repair.

Authors:  Markus P Arnold; Michael T Hirschmann; Peter C M Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Shinya Kawahara; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Clinical and diagnostic challenges of metal implant allergy using the example of orthopaedic surgical implants: Part 15 of the Series Molecular Allergology.

Authors:  Peter Thomas
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2014-09-29

4.  Do refinements to original designs improve outcome of total knee replacement? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marieke J Piepers; Ruud P van Hove; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Long-term survival and radiological results of the Duracon™ total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Bachmann; Lilianna Bolliger; Thomas Ilchmann; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Proposed Methods for Real-Time Measurement of Posterior Condylar Angle during TKA.

Authors:  Prateek Behera; Devendra Kumar Chouhan; Mahesh Prakash; Mandeep Dhillon
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-02

7.  Temporal Value of C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Elevated Preoperative C-Reactive Protein: A Matched-Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Seung Ah Lee; Seung-Baik Kang; Chan Yoon; Chong Bum Chang; Moon Jong Chang; Jai Gon Seo
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  [Clinical application of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities].

Authors:  Bi Wu; Yue Wang; Peng Hao; Junwei Feng
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-15

9.  Radiological method for measuring patellofemoral tracking and tibiofemoral kinematics before and after total knee replacement.

Authors:  G B Sharma; S K Saevarsson; S Amiri; S Montgomery; H Ramm; D D Lichti; R Lieck; S Zachow; C Anglin
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.