Literature DB >> 33624127

Quality control of cytostatic drug preparations-comparison of workflow and performance of Raman/UV and high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD).

Lars M H Reinders1,2,3, Martin D Klassen1, Claudia Vom Eyser1, Thorsten Teutenberg4, Martin Jaeger2, Torsten C Schmidt3, Jochen Tuerk1.   

Abstract

The drugs used for treatment during chemotherapy are manufactured individually for each patient in specialised pharmacies. Thorough quality control to confirm the identity of the delivered active pharmaceutical ingredient and the final concentration of the prepared application solution is not standardized yet except for optical or gravimetric testing. However, solution stability problems, counterfeit drugs, and erroneous or deliberate underdosage may occur and negatively influence the quality of the product and could cause severe health risks for the patient. To take a step towards analytical quality control, an on-site analytical instrument using Raman and UV absorption spectroscopy was employed and the results were compared to high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detection. Within the scope of the technology evaluation, the uncertainty of measurement was determined for the analysis of the five frequently used cytostatic drugs 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, irinotecan and paclitaxel. The Raman/UV technique (2.0-3.2% uncertainty of measurement; level of confidence: 95%) achieves a combined uncertainty of measurement comparable to HPLC-DAD (1.7-3.2% uncertainty of measurement; level of confidence: 95%) for the substances 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and gemcitabine. However, the uncertainty of measurement for the substances irinotecan and paclitaxel is three times higher when the Raman/UV technique is used. This is due to the fact that the Raman/UV technique analyses the undiluted sample; therefore, the sample has a higher viscosity and tendency to foam. Out of 136 patient-specific preparations analysed within this study, 96% had a deviation of less than 10% from the target content.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytostatic drug preparations; HPLC-DAD; Method comparison; Quality control; Raman/UV; Uncertainty of measurement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33624127     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03223-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  11 in total

1.  Typical medication errors in oncology: analysis and prevention strategies.

Authors:  T Müller
Journal:  Onkologie       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Comparative analysis of methods for real-time analytical control of chemotherapies preparations.

Authors:  Christophe Bazin; Bruno Cassard; Eric Caudron; Patrice Prognon; Laurent Havard
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.875

3.  Non-invasive quantification of 5 fluorouracil and gemcitabine in aqueous matrix by direct measurement through glass vials using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Laetitia Minh Mai Lê; Eric Caudron; Arlette Baillet-Guffroy; Luc Eveleigh
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 6.057

4.  Quantitative and qualitative control of antineoplastic preparations: Gravimetry versus HPLC.

Authors:  Ana Sendra-García; M Amparo Martínez-Gómez; Asunción Albert-Marí; N Victor Jiménez-Torres; Mónica Climente-Martí
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.809

5.  Simple and ultra-fast recognition and quantitation of compounded monoclonal antibodies: Application to flow injection analysis combined to UV spectroscopy and matching method.

Authors:  E Jaccoulet; A Schweitzer-Chaput; B Toussaint; P Prognon; E Caudron
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.057

6.  Quantification of gemcitabine intravenous drugs by direct measurement in chemotherapy plastic bags using a handheld Raman spectrometer.

Authors:  L Lê; M Berge; A Tfayli; A Baillet Guffroy; P Prognon; A Dowek; E Caudron
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 6.057

7.  Understanding and managing intravenous container overfill; potential dose confusion.

Authors:  Michael R Cohen; Judy L Smetzer
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-03

8.  DrugCam®-An intelligent video camera system to make safe cytotoxic drug preparations.

Authors:  Frédéric Benizri; Benoit Dalifard; Christophe Zemmour; Maxime Henriquet; Emmanuelle Fougereau; Benoit Le Franc
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.875

9.  Capillary electrophoresis for rapid identification of monoclonal antibodies for routine application in hospital.

Authors:  Emmanuel Jaccoulet; Claire Smadja; Patrice Prognon; Myriam Taverna
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  A UV-Raman spectrometry method for quality control of anticancer preparations: Results after 18 months of implementation in hospital pharmacy.

Authors:  Flore Nardella; Morgane Beck; Pierre Collart-Dutilleul; Guillaume Becker; Coralie Boulanger; Laurent Perello; Anne Gairard-Dory; Bénédicte Gourieux; Geneviève Ubeaud-Séquier
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.875

View more
  1 in total

1.  Flexible Digitization of Highly Individualized Workflows Demonstrated Through the Quality Control of Patient-Specific Cytostatic Application Bags: Digitization from the Perspective of Small and Medium-Sized Laboratories.

Authors:  Max Jochums; Lars M H Reinders; Jochen Tuerk; Thorsten Teutenberg
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.768

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.