Literature DB >> 33622128

Male-like female morphs in hummingbirds: the evolution of a widespread sex-limited plumage polymorphism.

Eleanor S Diamant1,2, Jay J Falk3, Dustin R Rubenstein1.   

Abstract

Differences in the way males and females look or behave are common in animals. However, discrete variation within sexes (sex-limited polymorphism) also occurs in several vertebrate and invertebrate lineages. In birds, female-limited polymorphism (FLP) in which some females resemble males in coloration is most prominent in hummingbirds, a group known for its morphological and behavioural sexual dimorphism. Yet, it remains unclear whether this intrasexual colour variation in hummingbirds arises through direct selection on females, or indirectly as a non-adaptive byproduct resulting from selection on males. Here, we analysed specimens from more than 300 hummingbird species to determine the extent, evolutionary history and function of FLP. We found that FLP evolved independently in every major clade and occurs in nearly 25% of hummingbird species. Using phylogenetically informed analyses, we rejected non-adaptive hypotheses that FLP is the result of indirect selection or pleiotropy across species. Instead, FLP is associated with ecology, migratory status, and marginally with social dominance, suggesting a socioecological benefit to females. Ultimately, we show that FLP is not only widespread in hummingbirds and likely adaptive, but may also be useful for understanding the evolution of female ornamentation in systems under strong sexual selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hummingbirds; plumage; sex-limited polymorphism; social selection; social signalling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622128      PMCID: PMC7935062          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration.

Authors:  James Dale; Cody J Dey; Kaspar Delhey; Bart Kempenaers; Mihai Valcu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Female finery is not for males.

Authors:  Natasha R LeBas
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy.

Authors:  Jimmy A McGuire; Christopher C Witt; Douglas L Altshuler; J V Remsen
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.

Authors:  Courtney L Fitzpatrick; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Subtle, pervasive genetic correlation between the sexes in the evolution of dimorphic hummingbird tail ornaments.

Authors:  Christopher J Clark; David Rankin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Geographic variation, frequency-dependent selection, and the maintenance of a female-limited polymorphism.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Lauren Bonvini; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Specialization in plant-hummingbird networks is associated with species richness, contemporary precipitation and quaternary climate-change velocity.

Authors:  Bo Dalsgaard; Else Magård; Jon Fjeldså; Ana M Martín González; Carsten Rahbek; Jens M Olesen; Jeff Ollerton; Ruben Alarcón; Andrea Cardoso Araujo; Peter A Cotton; Carlos Lara; Caio Graco Machado; Ivan Sazima; Marlies Sazima; Allan Timmermann; Stella Watts; Brody Sandel; William J Sutherland; Jens-Christian Svenning
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Factors affecting the dominance hierarchy dynamics in a hummingbird assemblage.

Authors:  Ubaldo Márquez-Luna; Carlos Lara; Pablo Corcuera; Pedro Luis Valverde
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset.

Authors:  Ian Harris; Timothy J Osborn; Phil Jones; David Lister
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  3 in total

1.  Intersexual social dominance mimicry drives female hummingbird polymorphism.

Authors:  Jay J Falk; Dustin R Rubenstein; Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Michael S Webster
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Male-like female morphs in hummingbirds: the evolution of a widespread sex-limited plumage polymorphism.

Authors:  Eleanor S Diamant; Jay J Falk; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The evolutionary history and mechanistic basis of female ornamentation in a tropical songbird.

Authors:  Erik D Enbody; Simon Y W Sin; Jordan Boersma; Scott V Edwards; Serena Ketaloya; Hubert Schwabl; Michael S Webster; Jordan Karubian
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.171

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.