Literature DB >> 33621916

A global overview of the trophic structure within microbiomes across ecosystems.

Wu Xiong1, Alexandre Jousset2, Rong Li3, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo4, Mohammad Bahram5, Ramiro Logares6, Benjamin Wilden7, Gerard Arjen de Groot8, Nathalie Amacker9, George A Kowalchuk9, Qirong Shen10, Stefan Geisen11.   

Abstract

The colossal project of mapping the microbiome on Earth is rapidly advancing, with a focus on individual microbial groups. However, a global assessment of the associations between predatory protists and their bacterial prey is still missing at a cross-ecosystem level. This knowledge is critical to better understand the importance of top-down links in structuring microbiomes. Here, we examined 38 sequence-based datasets of paired bacterial and protistan taxa, covering 3,178 samples from diverse habitats including freshwater, marine and soils. We show that community profiles of protists and bacteria strongly correlated across and within habitats, with trophic microbiome structures fundamentally differing across habitats. Soils hosted the most heterogenous and diverse microbiomes. Protist communities were dominated by predators in soils and phototrophs in aquatic environments. This led to changes in the ratio of total protists to bacteria richness, which was highest in marine, while that of predatory protists to bacteria was highest in soils. Taxon richness and relative abundance of predatory protists positively correlated with bacterial richness in marine habitats. These links differed between soils, predatory protist richness and the relative abundance of predatory protists positively correlated with bacterial richness in forest and grassland soils, but not in agricultural soils. Our results suggested that anthropogenic pressure affects higher trophic levels more than lower ones leading to a decoupled trophic structure in microbiomes. Together, our cumulative overview of microbiome patterns of bacteria and protists at the global scale revealed major patterns and differences of the trophic structure of microbiomes across Earth's habitats, and show that anthropogenic factors might have negative effects on the trophic structure within microbiomes. Furthermore, the increased impact of anthropogenic factors on especially higher trophic levels suggests that often-observed reduced ecosystem functions in anthropogenic systems might be partly attributed to a reduction of trophic complexity.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; High-throughput sequencing; Microbiome; Protists; Trophic structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33621916     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  3 in total

1.  Global hotspots for soil nature conservation.

Authors:  Carlos A Guerra; Miguel Berdugo; David J Eldridge; Nico Eisenhauer; Brajesh K Singh; Haiying Cui; Sebastian Abades; Fernando D Alfaro; Adebola R Bamigboye; Felipe Bastida; José L Blanco-Pastor; Asunción de Los Ríos; Jorge Durán; Tine Grebenc; Javier G Illán; Yu-Rong Liu; Thulani P Makhalanyane; Steven Mamet; Marco A Molina-Montenegro; José L Moreno; Arpan Mukherjee; Tina U Nahberger; Gabriel F Peñaloza-Bojacá; César Plaza; Sergio Picó; Jay Prakash Verma; Ana Rey; Alexandra Rodríguez; Leho Tedersoo; Alberto L Teixido; Cristian Torres-Díaz; Pankaj Trivedi; Juntao Wang; Ling Wang; Jianyong Wang; Eli Zaady; Xiaobing Zhou; Xin-Quan Zhou; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 69.504

2.  Trophic interactions between predatory protists and pathogen-suppressive bacteria impact plant health.

Authors:  Sai Guo; Chengyuan Tao; Alexandre Jousset; Wu Xiong; Zhe Wang; Zongzhuan Shen; Beibei Wang; Zhihui Xu; Zhilei Gao; Shanshan Liu; Rong Li; Yunze Ruan; Qirong Shen; George A Kowalchuk; Stefan Geisen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 11.217

3.  Protist feeding patterns and growth rate are related to their predatory impacts on soil bacterial communities.

Authors:  Nathalie Amacker; Zhilei Gao; Jie Hu; Alexandre L C Jousset; George A Kowalchuk; Stefan Geisen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.519

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.