Literature DB >> 35461357

Trophic interactions between predatory protists and pathogen-suppressive bacteria impact plant health.

Sai Guo1,2, Chengyuan Tao1,2, Alexandre Jousset3, Wu Xiong1,2,3, Zhe Wang1,2, Zongzhuan Shen1,2, Beibei Wang4, Zhihui Xu1,2, Zhilei Gao3, Shanshan Liu1,2, Rong Li5,6, Yunze Ruan4, Qirong Shen7,8, George A Kowalchuk3, Stefan Geisen9,10.   

Abstract

Plant health is strongly impacted by beneficial and pathogenic plant microbes, which are themselves structured by resource inputs. Organic fertilizer inputs may thus offer a means of steering soil-borne microbes, thereby affecting plant health. Concurrently, soil microbes are subject to top-down control by predators, particularly protists. However, little is known regarding the impact of microbiome predators on plant health-influencing microbes and the interactive links to plant health. Here, we aimed to decipher the importance of predator-prey interactions in influencing plant health. To achieve this goal, we investigated soil and root-associated microbiomes (bacteria, fungi and protists) over nine years of banana planting under conventional and organic fertilization regimes differing in Fusarium wilt disease incidence. We found that the reduced disease incidence and improved yield associated with organic fertilization could be best explained by higher abundances of protists and pathogen-suppressive bacteria (e.g. Bacillus spp.). The pathogen-suppressive actions of predatory protists and Bacillus spp. were mainly determined by their interactions that increased the relative abundance of secondary metabolite Q genes (e.g. nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene) within the microbiome. In a subsequent microcosm assay, we tested the interactions between predatory protists and pathogen-suppressive Bacillus spp. that showed strong improvements in plant defense. Our study shows how protistan predators stimulate disease-suppressive bacteria in the plant microbiome, ultimately enhancing plant health and yield. Thus, we suggest a new biological model useful for improving sustainable agricultural practices that is based on complex interactions between different domains of life.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Society for Microbial Ecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35461357      PMCID: PMC9296445          DOI: 10.1038/s41396-022-01244-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   11.217


  57 in total

1.  Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Jason A Jackson; Rytas Vilgalys; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A global overview of the trophic structure within microbiomes across ecosystems.

Authors:  Wu Xiong; Alexandre Jousset; Rong Li; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Mohammad Bahram; Ramiro Logares; Benjamin Wilden; Gerard Arjen de Groot; Nathalie Amacker; George A Kowalchuk; Qirong Shen; Stefan Geisen
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  Competition sensing: the social side of bacterial stress responses.

Authors:  Daniel M Cornforth; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes--application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts.

Authors:  M Gardes; T D Bruns
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Soil science. Soil and human security in the 21st century.

Authors:  Ronald Amundson; Asmeret Asefaw Berhe; Jan W Hopmans; Carolyn Olson; A Ester Sztein; Donald L Sparks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice.

Authors:  Joseph Edwards; Cameron Johnson; Christian Santos-Medellín; Eugene Lurie; Natraj Kumar Podishetty; Srijak Bhatnagar; Jonathan A Eisen; Venkatesan Sundaresan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Predators promote defence of rhizosphere bacterial populations by selective feeding on non-toxic cheaters.

Authors:  Alexandre Jousset; Laurène Rochat; Maria Péchy-Tarr; Christoph Keel; Stefan Scheu; Michael Bonkowski
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Effect of long-term organic and mineral fertilization strategies on rhizosphere microbiota assemblage and performance of lettuce.

Authors:  Soumitra Paul Chowdhury; Doreen Babin; Martin Sandmann; Samuel Jacquiod; Loreen Sommermann; Søren Johannes Sørensen; Andreas Fliessbach; Paul Mäder; Joerg Geistlinger; Kornelia Smalla; Michael Rothballer; Rita Grosch
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  Land-use intensification differentially affects bacterial, fungal and protist communities and decreases microbiome network complexity.

Authors:  Sana Romdhane; Aymé Spor; Samiran Banerjee; Marie-Christine Breuil; David Bru; Abad Chabbi; Sara Hallin; Marcel G A van der Heijden; Aurélien Saghai; Laurent Philippot
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-01-06

10.  The global-scale distributions of soil protists and their contributions to belowground systems.

Authors:  Angela M Oliverio; Stefan Geisen; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Fernando T Maestre; Benjamin L Turner; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  High bacterial diversity and siderophore-producing bacteria collectively suppress Fusarium oxysporum in maize/faba bean intercropping.

Authors:  Xinzhan Sun; Chaochun Zhang; Shuikuan Bei; Guangzhou Wang; Stefan Geisen; Laurent Bedoussac; Peter Christie; Junling Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.