Literature DB >> 33621263

Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.

Qing Sun1, Jonathan Li1, Hui Ren1, Larry Pastor1, Yulia Loginova1, Roberta Madej1, Kristopher Taylor2, Joseph K Wong2, Zhao Zhang1, Aiguo Zhang1, Chuanyi M Lu2, Michael Y Sha1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensitive and high throughput molecular detection assays are essential during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The vast majority of the SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays use nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) or oropharyngeal swab (OPS) specimens collected from suspected individuals. However, using NPS or OPS as specimens has apparent drawbacks, e.g. the collection procedures for NPS or OPS specimens can be uncomfortable to some people and may cause sneezing and coughing which in turn generate droplets and/or aerosol particles that are of risk to healthcare workers, requiring heavy use of personal protective equipment. There have been recent studies indicating that self-collected saliva specimens can be used for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 and provides more comfort and ease of use for the patients. Here we report the performance of QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test using saliva as the testing specimens with or without pooling.
METHODS: Development and validation studies were conducted following FDA-EUA and molecular assay validation guidelines. Using SeraCare Accuplex SARS-CoV-2 reference panel, the limit of detection (LOD) and clinical performance studies were performed with the QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test. For clinical evaluation, 85 known positive and 90 known negative clinical NPS samples were tested. Additionally, twenty paired NPS and saliva samples collected from recovering COVID-19 patients were tested and the results were further compared to that of the Abbott m2000 SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay. Results of community collected 389 saliva samples for COVID-19 screening by QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test were also obtained and analyzed. Additionally, testing of pooled saliva samples was evaluated.
RESULTS: The LOD for the QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test was confirmed to be 100-200 copies/mL. The clinical performance studies using contrived saliva samples indicated that the positive percentage agreement (PPA) of the QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test is 100% at 1xLOD, 1.5xLOD and 2.5xLOD. No cross-reactivity was observed for the QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test with common respiratory pathogens. Testing of clinical samples showed a positive percentage agreement (PPA) of 100% (95% CI: 94.6% to 100%) and a negative percentage agreement (NPA) of 98.9% (95% CI: 93.1% to 99.9%). QuantiVirus™ SARS CoV-2 test had 80% concordance rate and no significant difference (p = 0.13) between paired saliva and NPS specimens by Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. Positive test rate was 1.79% for 389 saliva specimens collected from local communities for COVID-19 screening. Preliminary data showed that saliva sample pooling up to 6 samples (1:6 pooling) for SARS-CoV-2 detection is feasible (sensitivity 94.8% and specificity 100%).
CONCLUSION: The studies demonstrated that the QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test has a LOD of 200 copies/mL in contrived saliva samples. The clinical performance of saliva-based testing is comparable to that of NPS-based testing. Pooling of saliva specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection is feasible. Saliva based and high-throughput QuantiVirus™ SARS-CoV-2 test offers a highly desirable testing platform during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33621263      PMCID: PMC7901781          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  17 in total

1.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.

Authors:  Roman Wölfel; Victor M Corman; Wolfgang Guggemos; Michael Seilmaier; Sabine Zange; Marcel A Müller; Daniela Niemeyer; Terry C Jones; Patrick Vollmar; Camilla Rothe; Michael Hoelscher; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Rosina Ehmann; Katrin Zwirglmaier; Christian Drosten; Clemens Wendtner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Suboptimal Biological Sampling as a Probable Cause of False-Negative COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Results.

Authors:  Natalie N Kinloch; Gordon Ritchie; Chanson J Brumme; Winnie Dong; Weiyan Dong; Tanya Lawson; R Brad Jones; Julio S G Montaner; Victor Leung; Marc G Romney; Aleksandra Stefanovic; Nancy Matic; Christopher F Lowe; Zabrina L Brumme
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  A Review of Salivary Diagnostics and Its Potential Implication in Detection of Covid-19.

Authors:  Tatikonda Sri Santosh; Reshu Parmar; Hanish Anand; Konkati Srikanth; Madham Saritha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-17

4.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

5.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.

Authors:  Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Shuofeng Yuan; Kin-Hang Kok; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Hin Chu; Jin Yang; Fanfan Xing; Jieling Liu; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Simon Kam-Fai Lo; Kwok-Hung Chan; Vincent Kwok-Man Poon; Wan-Mui Chan; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Jian-Piao Cai; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Honglin Chen; Christopher Kim-Ming Hui; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Deep throat saliva as an alternative diagnostic specimen type for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Eddie Chi-Man Leung; Viola Chi-Ying Chow; May Kin-Ping Lee; Raymond Wai-Man Lai
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 20.693

7.  Challenges in use of saliva for detection of SARS CoV-2 RNA in symptomatic outpatients.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; Jody Criscuolo; David R Peaper
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Saliva: potential diagnostic value and transmission of 2019-nCoV.

Authors:  Ruoshi Xu; Bomiao Cui; Xiaobo Duan; Ping Zhang; Xuedong Zhou; Quan Yuan
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.344

10.  Self-Collected Anterior Nasal and Saliva Specimens versus Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  K E Hanson; A P Barker; D R Hillyard; N Gilmore; J W Barrett; R R Orlandi; S M Shakir
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  12 in total

1.  Risk of COVID-19 re-infection and its predictors (CORES): protocol for a community-based longitudinal cohort study in Vellore, India.

Authors:  Ramya Madhavan; Jackwin Sam Paul; Sudhir Babji; Dilesh Kumar; Savit B Prabhu; Harsha Kandi Pulleri; Ravikiran Annadorai; Sampreeth Ravi Gowda; Jacob John; Gagandeep Kang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Viral RNA Load and Infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in Paired Respiratory and Oral Specimens from Symptomatic, Asymptomatic, or Postsymptomatic Individuals.

Authors:  Rebecca L Tallmadge; Melissa Laverack; Brittany Cronk; Roopa Venugopalan; Mathias Martins; XiuLin Zhang; François Elvinger; Elizabeth Plocharczyk; Diego G Diel
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Development and implementation of a simple and rapid extraction-free saliva SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP workflow for workplace surveillance.

Authors:  Zhiru Li; Jacqueline L Bruce; Barry Cohen; Caileigh V Cunningham; William E Jack; Katell Kunin; Bradley W Langhorst; Jacob Miller; Reynes A Moncion; Catherine B Poole; Prem K Premsrirut; Guoping Ren; Richard J Roberts; Nathan A Tanner; Yinhua Zhang; Clotilde K S Carlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A scoping review.

Authors:  Yifei Wang; Akshaya Upadhyay; Sangeeth Pillai; Parisa Khayambashi; Simon D Tran
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.068

5.  Diagnostic performances of common nucleic acid tests for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals and clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wing Ying Au; Peter Pak Hang Cheung
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2021-10-13

6.  Development of a high sensitivity RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled nasopharyngeal samples.

Authors:  Harindi Jayakody; Daniel Rowland; Clint Pereira; Rachel Blackwell; Tomasz Lasota; Mark Laverick; Laurence Tisi; Hannah S Leese; Alistair D S Walsham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection in nasopharyngeal swab, saliva, and gargle samples.

Authors:  Gustavo Genelhoud; Douglas Adamoski; Regiane Nogueira Spalanzani; Lucas Bochnia-Bueno; Jaqueline Carvalho de Oliveira; Daniela Fiori Gradia; Ana Cláudia Bonatto; Roseli Wassem; Sonia Mara Raboni; Meri Bordignon Nogueira; Patricia Savio de Araujo-Souza
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR testing of pooled saliva samples: A case study of 824 asymptomatic individuals and a questionnaire survey in Japan.

Authors:  Junna Oba; Hiroaki Taniguchi; Masae Sato; Masaki Takanashi; Moe Yokemura; Yasunori Sato; Hiroshi Nishihara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Implementation of a pooled surveillance testing program for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in K-12 schools and universities.

Authors:  Rachelle P Mendoza; Chongfeng Bi; Hui-Ting Cheng; Elmer Gabutan; Guillerre Jan Pagaspas; Nadia Khan; Helen Hoxie; Stephen Hanna; Kelly Holmes; Nicholas Gao; Raychel Lewis; Huaien Wang; Daniel Neumann; Angela Chan; Meril Takizawa; James Lowe; Xiao Chen; Brianna Kelly; Aneeza Asif; Keena Barnes; Nusrat Khan; Brandon May; Tasnim Chowdhury; Gabriella Pollonini; Nourelhoda Gouda; Chante Guy; Candice Gordon; Nana Ayoluwa; Elvin Colon; Noah Miller-Medzon; Shanique Jones; Rauful Hossain; Arabia Dodson; Meimei Weng; Miranda McGaskey; Ana Vasileva; Andrew E Lincoln; Robby Sikka; Anne L Wyllie; Ethan M Berke; Jenny Libien; Matthew Pincus; Prem K Premsrirut
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-07-17

Review 10.  Nucleic Acid Testing of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Hee Min Yoo; Il-Hwan Kim; Seil Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.