| Literature DB >> 33618348 |
Chuan-Chao Wang1,2,3,4, Hui-Yuan Yeh5, Alexander N Popov6, Hu-Qin Zhang7, Hirofumi Matsumura8, Kendra Sirak9,10, Olivia Cheronet11, Alexey Kovalev12, Nadin Rohland9, Alexander M Kim9,13, Swapan Mallick9,10,14,15, Rebecca Bernardos9, Dashtseveg Tumen16, Jing Zhao7, Yi-Chang Liu17, Jiun-Yu Liu18, Matthew Mah9,14,15, Ke Wang19, Zhao Zhang9, Nicole Adamski9,15, Nasreen Broomandkhoshbacht9,15, Kimberly Callan9,15, Francesca Candilio11, Kellie Sara Duffett Carlson11, Brendan J Culleton20, Laurie Eccles21, Suzanne Freilich11, Denise Keating11, Ann Marie Lawson9,15, Kirsten Mandl11, Megan Michel9,15, Jonas Oppenheimer9,15, Kadir Toykan Özdoğan11, Kristin Stewardson9,15, Shaoqing Wen22, Shi Yan23, Fatma Zalzala9,15, Richard Chuang17, Ching-Jung Huang17, Hana Looh24, Chung-Ching Shiung17, Yuri G Nikitin25, Andrei V Tabarev26, Alexey A Tishkin27, Song Lin7, Zhou-Yong Sun28, Xiao-Ming Wu7, Tie-Lin Yang7, Xi Hu7, Liang Chen29, Hua Du30, Jamsranjav Bayarsaikhan31, Enkhbayar Mijiddorj32, Diimaajav Erdenebaatar32, Tumur-Ochir Iderkhangai32, Erdene Myagmar16, Hideaki Kanzawa-Kiriyama33, Masato Nishino34, Ken-Ichi Shinoda33, Olga A Shubina35, Jianxin Guo36, Wangwei Cai37, Qiongying Deng38, Longli Kang39, Dawei Li40, Dongna Li41, Rong Lin41, Rukesh Shrestha42, Ling-Xiang Wang42, Lanhai Wei36, Guangmao Xie43,44, Hongbing Yao45, Manfei Zhang42, Guanglin He36, Xiaomin Yang36, Rong Hu36, Martine Robbeets46, Stephan Schiffels19, Douglas J Kennett47, Li Jin42, Hui Li42, Johannes Krause48, Ron Pinhasi49, David Reich50,51,52,53.
Abstract
The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33618348 PMCID: PMC7993749 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03336-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962