Literature DB >> 3361673

Evaluation of patients and partners 1 to 4 years after penile prosthesis surgery.

B Pedersen1, L Tiefer, M Ruiz, A Melman.   

Abstract

One to 4 years after penile prosthesis implantation 52 men and 22 partners were interviewed personally. All except 4 patients were having intercourse on a regular basis. A quarter of the patients reported restriction in intercourse positions, possibly because of a smaller penis postoperatively, and 15 per cent reported decreased orgasm intensity. Six men had an undiagnosed prosthesis malfunction or they used an inadequate pumping technique, suggesting that prosthesis patients should be followed on a continuing basis. The 52 men had experienced 10 malfunctions with the prosthesis. Partial erections were reported by 69 per cent of the patients but this could be confirmed in only 1 of 10 with visual sexual stimulation testing. It is suggested that differences between prosthesis models are more a result of psychological, relationship and health factors than mechanical factors. Of the patients 79 per cent would undergo the operation again but only 59 per cent of the partners had no hesitations. The longer the postoperative period the more hesitations. A satisfaction score was used to measure patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3361673     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42728-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Penile prosthesis implantation for end-stage erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Economic cost of male erectile dysfunction using a decision analytic model: for a hypothetical managed-care plan of 100,000 members.

Authors:  H L Tan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Psychosexual functioning of partners of men with presumed non-organic erectile dysfunction: cause or consequence of the disorder?

Authors:  A E Speckens; M W Hengeveld; G Lycklama à Nijeholt; A M van Hemert; K E Hawton
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1995-04

Review 4.  Current status of penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  D K Montague; K W Angermeier
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.862

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.