Literature DB >> 33221142

Effects of a Community-Level Intervention on Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crashes in California Cities: A Randomized Trial.

Robert F Saltz1, Mallie J Paschall2, Sharon E O'Hara2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This trial assesses the effects of a community-level alcohol prevention intervention in California on alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes. STUDY
DESIGN: The study is a group RCT with cities as the unit of assignment to condition and as the unit of analysis. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 24 California cities with populations between 50,000 and 450,000 were chosen at random and roughly matched into pairs before randomly assigning 12 each to the intervention and control conditions. INTERVENTION: The intervention, aimed at reducing excessive drinking among adolescents and young adults, included driving under the influence sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, and undercover operations to reduce service of alcohol to intoxicated patrons in bars, all including high visibility so the public would be aware of them. A measure of overall intervention intensity or dosage was created. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome was a monthly percentage of all motor vehicle crashes that were single vehicle nighttime crashes for drivers aged 15-30 years.
RESULTS: Multilevel analyses were conducted to examine intervention effects on alcohol-related crashes among drivers aged 15-30 years. Crash data were obtained in 2018 with data preparation and analysis conducted in 2019. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated a 17% reduction in the percentage of alcohol-involved crashes among drivers aged 15-30 years relative to controls, which translates to about 310 fewer crashes. Dosage was found to have a statistically significant effect on crashes among this age group, although not in the expected direction.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced alcohol enforcement operations involving both community health and law enforcement agencies can help to reduce alcohol-impaired driving and related consequences among young people. Including measures of intervention dosage raises interesting questions about the understanding of the impact of the community intervention. Future studies should continue to further develop implementation strategies that may more effectively and efficiently reduce community alcohol-related harm.
Copyright © 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33221142      PMCID: PMC8492018          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  22 in total

1.  Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries.

Authors:  H D Holder; P J Gruenewald; W R Ponicki; A J Treno; J W Grube; R F Saltz; R B Voas; R Reynolds; J Davis; L Sanchez; G Gaumont; P Roeper
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Overserving at licensed premises in Stockholm: effects of a community action program.

Authors:  Eva Wallin; Johanna Gripenberg; Sven Andréasson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-11

3.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of alcohol prevention targeting licensed premises.

Authors:  Anna M Månsdotter; Malin K Rydberg; Eva Wallin; Lars A Lindholm; Sven Andréasson
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Preventing sales of alcohol to minors: results from a community trial.

Authors:  J W Grube
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students.

Authors:  Mark Wolfson; Heather Champion; Thomas P McCoy; Scott D Rhodes; Edward H Ip; Jill N Blocker; Barbara Alvarez Martin; Kimberly G Wagoner; Mary Claire O'Brien; Erin L Sutfin; Ananda Mitra; Robert H Durant
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  Whole-of-community interventions to reduce population-level harms arising from alcohol and other drug use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily Stockings; Kate Bartlem; Alix Hall; Rebecca Hodder; Conor Gilligan; John Wiggers; Shauna Sherker; Luke Wolfenden
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Alcohol risk management in college settings: the safer California universities randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert F Saltz; Mallie J Paschall; Richard P McGaffigan; Peter M O Nygaard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Alcohol prevention targeting licensed premises: a study of effects on violence.

Authors:  Eva Wallin; Thor Norström; Sven Andréasson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2003-03

9.  The Sacramento Neighborhood Alcohol Prevention Project: outcomes from a community prevention trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Treno; Paul J Gruenewald; Juliet P Lee; Lillian G Remer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  The effectiveness of community action in reducing risky alcohol consumption and harm: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony Shakeshaft; Christopher Doran; Dennis Petrie; Courtney Breen; Alys Havard; Ansari Abudeen; Elissa Harwood; Anton Clifford; Catherine D'Este; Stuart Gilmour; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes and the size and duration of random breath testing checkpoints.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Muhire Kwizera; Qixuan Chen; Cheneal Puljevic; Charles C Branas; Douglas J Wiebe; Corinne Peek-Asa; Kirsten M McGavin; Shellee J Franssen; Vy K Le; Michael Keating; Frances M Williams; Jason Ferris
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.928

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.