| Literature DB >> 33614988 |
Aravind Ravichandran1, Manimegalai Babuji2, Mahasampath Gowri3, Muthukumar Karthikeyan1, Achamma Chandy1, Aleyamma T Kunjummen1, Mohan S Kamath1.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in dietary patterns among subfertile South Asian women undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Significant regional differences in dietary pattern exist among subfertile South Asian women undergoing FET. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Preconception consumption of certain food groups or adopting specific dietary patterns, such as the 'Mediterranean diet', and its level of adherence have been shown to enhance the odds of achieving a successful pregnancy in women undergoing ART. However, differences in geographic location, individual preference, cultural beliefs and local availability contribute to such dietary choices. There is also a predisposition to a vitamin B12 deficiency in those of South Asian ethnicity and a predominant pattern of vegetarian food intake. There is a paucity of studies analysing the type of dietary pattern followed by South Asian women, their vitamin B12 levels and the potential impact on ART treatment outcomes. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This is a cross-sectional study of 159 South Asian women aged 21-37 years, belonging to the Eastern (n = 75) and Southern (n = 84) regions of India plus Bangladesh, and undergoing a FET cycle at a tertiary level infertility clinic between February 2019 and March 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTINGEntities:
Keywords: assisted reproduction; dietary pattern; environmental effects; frozen embryo transfer; infertility; nutrition; pregnancy; vitamin B12
Year: 2021 PMID: 33614988 PMCID: PMC7882060 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod Open ISSN: 2399-3529
Clinical and dietary characteristics among South Asian women undergoing ART, based on geographic location.
| Geography |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| East | South | ||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| 30.80 | 30.63 | 0.786 |
|
| 24.49 | 25.31 | 0.162 |
|
| 0.145 | ||
| Yes | 26 (34.7) | 39 (47.0) | |
| No | 49 (65.3) | 44 (53.0) | |
|
| 0.315 | ||
| Primary | 53 (70.7) | 52 (62.7) | |
| Secondary | 22 (29.3) | 31 (37.3) | |
|
| 0.158 | ||
| Anovulation | 20 (26.7) | 32 (38.6) | |
| Male | 17 (22.7) | 21 (25.3) | |
| Tubal | 12 (16) | 13 (15.7) | |
| Unexplained | 5 (6.7) | 8 (9.6) | |
| Endometriosis | 18 (24) | 8 (9.6) | |
| Combination | 2 (2.7) | 1 (1.2) | |
| DOR | 1 (1.3) | – | |
|
| 0.275 | ||
| 1 | 63 (84) | 61 (73.5) | |
| 2 | 9 (12) | 18 (21.7) | |
| 3 | 3 (4) | 3 (3.6) | |
| 4 | – | 1 (1.2) | |
|
| 0.341 | ||
| Cleavage stage | 26 (34.7) | 30 (36.1) | |
| Blastocyst | 49 (65.3) | 53 (63.9) | |
|
| 0.130 | ||
| 1 | 9 (12) | 14 (16.9) | |
| 2 | 65 (86.7) | 63 (75.9) | |
| 3 | 1 (1.3) | 6 (7.2) | |
|
| |||
| Energy intake (Kcal/day)* | 1810.20 | 1637.66 | 0.002 |
| CHO intake (gm/day) | 268.41 | 260.20 | 0.505 |
| Protein intake (gm/day)* | 61.68 | 48.31 | <0.001 |
| Fat intake (gm/day) | 45.87 | 42.23 | 0.151 |
| ω3 PUFA intake (mg/day)** | 166 (115, 218) | 246 (196, 311) | <0.001 |
| Vitamin B12 intake (mcg/day)** | 1.46 (0.28, 2.90) | 0.35 (0.14, 0.70) | <0.001 |
| Serum vitamin B12 (pg/ml)** | 440.5 (335, 618) | 249 (164, 325) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Positive Pregnancy | 46 (61.3) | 48 (57.8) | 0.654 |
| Clinical pregnancy | 40 (53.3) | 43 (51.8) | 0.848 |
| Ongoing pregnancy | 29 (38.7) | 34 (41.0) | 0.768 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) for age, BMI and dietary characteristics.
Mean ± SD presented and significance assessed by Student’s t-test.
n (%) presented and significance tested by Pearson’s Chi-square.
Median (IQR) presented. Followed by a log transformation, significance was assessed using Student’s t-test.
CHO, carbohydrate; DOR, diminished ovarian reserve; FET, frozen embryo transfer; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome; ω3 PUFA, omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid.
Principal component analysis showing factor loading (>0.5) of each food group with the four dietary components.
| Food groups | Component 1 | Component 2 | Component 3 | Component 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green leafy vegetables | 0.7340 | |||
| Roots and tubers | 0.5380 | |||
| Nuts and oils | 0.5233 | |||
| Fruits | 0.7535 | |||
| Fish and seafood | 0.6194 | |||
| Meat and poultry | 0.5939 | |||
| Milk and milk products | 0.6133 | |||
| Sugar and jaggery | 0.7829 |
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy = 0.540; Bartlett's test of sphericity for food groups (P < 0.001).
Extraction method: Principal component analysis; Rotation method: Varimax.
Traditional cane sugar.
Comparison of component scores between the Eastern and Southern regions for the four PCA-derived components.
| Components | Component score based on geography |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| East (n = 75) | South (n = 83) | ||
|
| 0.83 (1.13) | −0.72 (0.83) | <0.001* |
|
| 0.26 (1.14) | −0.23 (1.10) | 0.006* |
|
| −0.11 (1.01) | 0.08 (1.20) | 0.288 |
|
| 0.03 (0.97) | −0.02 (1.18) | 0.764 |
Values presented as mean (SD) and significance assessed using Student’s t-test.
Statistically significant (P < 0.05).
PCA, principal component analysis.
Impact of dietary B12 intake and serum vitamin B12 levels on frozen embryo transfer treatment outcomes.
| Clinical pregnancy | Ongoing pregnancy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR (95% CI) |
| RR (95% CI) |
| |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.99 (0.71, 1.38) | 0.940 | 0.91 (0.63, 1.32) | 0.618 |
|
| 0.84 (0.56, 1.28) | 0.422 | 0.88 (0.57, 1.38) | 0.587 |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.87 (0.62, 1.23) | 0.443 | 1.02 (0.66, 1.59) | 0.919 |
|
| 1.02 (0.70, 1.48) | 0.928 | 0.98 (0.65, 1.48) | 0.914 |
|
| 0.95 (0.76, 1.20) | 0.679 | 0.90 (0.68, 1.19) | 0.461 |
|
| 0.97 (0.78, 1.22) | 0.820 | 0.99 (0.73, 1.33) | 0.930 |
For each variable a separate regression equation was modelled as per geography.
Note: Relative risk estimates calculated after adjustments for age and BMI.
RR, relative risk.
Association between serum vitamin B12 levels across quartiles and ART outcomes.
| Serum vitamin B12 Quartiles* (pg/ml) | N = 152 | Clinical pregnancy | Ongoing pregnancy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative risk (95% CI) |
| Relative risk (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| 38 | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
|
| 38 | 1.11 (0.60, 2.05) | 0.732 | 0.93 (0.46, 1.86) | 0.829 |
|
| 38 | 0.83 (0.41, 1.66) | 0.591 | 0.74 (0.33, 1.63) | 0.450 |
|
| 38 | 0.82 (0.38, 1.76) | 0.613 | 0.79 (0.34, 1.86) | 0.589 |
Quartile values presented as (minimum-maximum); Relative risk adjusted for age, BMI and geography.