Audrey J Gaskins1, Feiby L Nassan2, Yu-Han Chiu3, Mariel Arvizu3, Paige L Williams4, Myra G Keller5, Irene Souter6, Russ Hauser7, Jorge E Chavarro8. 1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston. Electronic address: agaskins@hsph.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston. 3. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Department of Biostatisticsr, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston. 5. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston. 6. Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston. 8. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing acceptance that nutrition may be related to fertility and specifically to assisted reproductive technologies success in women; however, there is still no specific dietary guidance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the relationship between pretreatment adherence to various dietary patterns and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. STUDY DESIGN: We followed up 357 women enrolled in the prospective Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) study, who underwent 608 assisted reproductive technologies cycles (2007-2017). Using a validated food frequency questionnaire completed prior to treatment, we assessed adherence to the Mediterranean diet, the alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010, the Fertility Diet (developed based on risk factors for anovulatory infertility), and a profertility diet we developed based on factors previously related to assisted reproductive technologies outcomes (higher intake of supplemental folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin D, low- rather than high-pesticide residue produce, whole grains, dairy, soy foods, and seafood rather than other meats). RESULTS: Higher adherence to the alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010 and Fertility Diet was not related to live birth following assisted reproductive technologies. Women in the second through the fourth quartiles of Mediterranean diet adherence had significantly higher probability of live birth (0.44, 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.49) compared with women in the first quartile (0.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.39); however, there was no additional benefit of adherence to the Mediterranean diet above the second quartile. Increased adherence to the profertility diet was linearly associated with assisted reproductive technologies outcomes. The adjusted odds (95% confidence interval) of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth were higher by 47% (21%, 77%), 43% (19%, 72%), and 53% (26%, 85%), respectively, per SD increase. The adjusted difference in the proportion of cycles resulting in live birth for women in the fourth vs first quartile of adherence to the profertility diet was 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.38). While the profertility diet was not related to estradiol levels, oocyte counts, or endometrial thickness, it was inversely associated with clinical pregnancy loss (odds ratio, 0.69, 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.90 per SD increase). CONCLUSION: Higher pretreatment adherence to the profertility diet was associated with an increased probability of live birth among women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Commonly recommended dietary advice such as adhering to the Mediterranean diet may not provide the most appropriate guidance for women undergoing infertility treatment in the United States.
BACKGROUND: There is growing acceptance that nutrition may be related to fertility and specifically to assisted reproductive technologies success in women; however, there is still no specific dietary guidance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the relationship between pretreatment adherence to various dietary patterns and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. STUDY DESIGN: We followed up 357 women enrolled in the prospective Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) study, who underwent 608 assisted reproductive technologies cycles (2007-2017). Using a validated food frequency questionnaire completed prior to treatment, we assessed adherence to the Mediterranean diet, the alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010, the Fertility Diet (developed based on risk factors for anovulatory infertility), and a profertility diet we developed based on factors previously related to assisted reproductive technologies outcomes (higher intake of supplemental folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin D, low- rather than high-pesticide residue produce, whole grains, dairy, soy foods, and seafood rather than other meats). RESULTS: Higher adherence to the alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010 and Fertility Diet was not related to live birth following assisted reproductive technologies. Women in the second through the fourth quartiles of Mediterranean diet adherence had significantly higher probability of live birth (0.44, 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.49) compared with women in the first quartile (0.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.39); however, there was no additional benefit of adherence to the Mediterranean diet above the second quartile. Increased adherence to the profertility diet was linearly associated with assisted reproductive technologies outcomes. The adjusted odds (95% confidence interval) of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth were higher by 47% (21%, 77%), 43% (19%, 72%), and 53% (26%, 85%), respectively, per SD increase. The adjusted difference in the proportion of cycles resulting in live birth for women in the fourth vs first quartile of adherence to the profertility diet was 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.38). While the profertility diet was not related to estradiol levels, oocyte counts, or endometrial thickness, it was inversely associated with clinical pregnancy loss (odds ratio, 0.69, 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.90 per SD increase). CONCLUSION: Higher pretreatment adherence to the profertility diet was associated with an increased probability of live birth among women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Commonly recommended dietary advice such as adhering to the Mediterranean diet may not provide the most appropriate guidance for women undergoing infertility treatment in the United States.
Authors: Changzheng Yuan; Donna Spiegelman; Eric B Rimm; Bernard A Rosner; Meir J Stampfer; Junaidah B Barnett; Jorge E Chavarro; Amy F Subar; Laura K Sampson; Walter C Willett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M C Afeiche; Y-H Chiu; A J Gaskins; P L Williams; I Souter; D L Wright; R Hauser; J E Chavarro Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Audrey J Gaskins; Yu-Han Chiu; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Thomas L Toth; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Marijana Vujkovic; Jeanne H de Vries; Jan Lindemans; Nick S Macklon; Peter J van der Spek; Eric A P Steegers; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Stephanie E Chiuve; Teresa T Fung; Eric B Rimm; Frank B Hu; Marjorie L McCullough; Molin Wang; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett Journal: J Nutr Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Osamu Ishihara; G David Adamson; Silke Dyer; Jacques de Mouzon; Karl G Nygren; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Fernando Zegers-Hochschild; Ragaa Mansour Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-12-13 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Audrey J Gaskins; Myriam C Afeiche; Diane L Wright; Thomas L Toth; Paige L Williams; Matthew W Gillman; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Irene Souter; Audrey J Gaskins; Mariel Arvizu; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Lynn M Yee; Robert M Silver; David M Haas; Samuel Parry; Brian M Mercer; Jay Iams; Deborah Wing; Corette B Parker; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; William A Grobman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Shan Xuan Lim; See Ling Loy; Marjorelee T Colega; Jun Shi Lai; Keith M Godfrey; Yung Seng Lee; Kok Hian Tan; Fabian Yap; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Yap Seng Chong; Johan G Eriksson; Jerry Kok Yen Chan; Shiao-Yng Chan; Mary Foong-Fong Chong Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 8.472