Vincenzo Russo1, Camilla Sportoletti2, Giulia Scalas3, Domenico Attinà2, Francesco Buia2, Fabio Niro2, Cecilia Modolon3, Carlo De Luca3, Francesco Monteduro3, Luigi Lovato2. 1. Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Cardio-Thoracic Radiology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Block 23, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. virusso@fastwebnet.it. 2. Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Cardio-Thoracic Radiology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Block 23, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. 3. Emergency Department, Radiology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of triple rule out computed tomography (TRO-CT) in an emergency radiology workflow by comparing the diagnostic performance of cardiovascular and general radiologists in the interpretation of emergency TRO-CT studies in patients with acute and atypical chest pain. METHODS: Between July 2017 and December 2019, 350 adult patients underwent TRO-CT studies for the assessment of atypical chest pain. Three radiologists with different fields and years of expertise (a cardioradiologist-CR, an emergency senior radiologist-SER, and an emergency junior radiologist-JER) retrospectively and independently reviewed all TRO-CT studies, by trans-axial and multiplanar reconstruction only. Concordance rates were then calculated using as reference blinded results from a different senior cardioradiologist, who previously evaluated studies using all available analysis software. RESULTS: Concordance rate was 100% for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and pulmonary embolism (PE). About coronary stenosis (CS) for non-obstructive (<50%), CS concordance rates were 97.98%, 90.91%, and 97.18%, respectively, for CR, SER, and JER; for obstructive CS (>50%), concordance rates were respectively 88%, 85.7%, and 71.43%. Moreover, it was globally observed a better performance in the evaluation of last half of examinations compared with the first one. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirm the feasibility of the TRO-CT even in an Emergency Radiology department that cannot rely on a 24/7 availability of a dedicated skilled cardiovascular radiologist. The "undedicated" radiologists could exclude with good diagnostic accuracy the presence of obstructive stenosis, those with a clinical impact on patient management, without needing time-consuming software and/or reconstructions.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of triple rule out computed tomography (TRO-CT) in an emergency radiology workflow by comparing the diagnostic performance of cardiovascular and general radiologists in the interpretation of emergency TRO-CT studies in patients with acute and atypical chest pain. METHODS: Between July 2017 and December 2019, 350 adult patients underwent TRO-CT studies for the assessment of atypical chest pain. Three radiologists with different fields and years of expertise (a cardioradiologist-CR, an emergency senior radiologist-SER, and an emergency junior radiologist-JER) retrospectively and independently reviewed all TRO-CT studies, by trans-axial and multiplanar reconstruction only. Concordance rates were then calculated using as reference blinded results from a different senior cardioradiologist, who previously evaluated studies using all available analysis software. RESULTS: Concordance rate was 100% for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and pulmonary embolism (PE). About coronary stenosis (CS) for non-obstructive (<50%), CS concordance rates were 97.98%, 90.91%, and 97.18%, respectively, for CR, SER, and JER; for obstructive CS (>50%), concordance rates were respectively 88%, 85.7%, and 71.43%. Moreover, it was globally observed a better performance in the evaluation of last half of examinations compared with the first one. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirm the feasibility of the TRO-CT even in an Emergency Radiology department that cannot rely on a 24/7 availability of a dedicated skilled cardiovascular radiologist. The "undedicated" radiologists could exclude with good diagnostic accuracy the presence of obstructive stenosis, those with a clinical impact on patient management, without needing time-consuming software and/or reconstructions.
Authors: Gabija Pundziute; Joanne D Schuijf; J Wouter Jukema; Eric Boersma; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David Ayaram; M Fernanda Bellolio; M Hassan Murad; Torrey A Laack; Annie T Sadosty; Patricia J Erwin; Judd E Hollander; Victor M Montori; Ian G Stiell; Erik P Hess Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Riccardo Marano; Francesco De Cobelli; Irene Floriani; Christoph Becker; Christopher Herzog; Maurizio Centonze; Giovanni Morana; Gian Franco Gualdi; Guido Ligabue; Gianluca Pontone; Carlo Catalano; Dante Chiappino; Massimo Midiri; Giovanni Simonetti; Filippo Marchisio; Lucio Olivetti; Rossella Fattori; Lorenzo Bonomo; Alessandro Del Maschio Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 5.315