Literature DB >> 33604445

The effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs on self-perceived health of employees with a low socioeconomic position: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Hanneke van Heijster1, Cécile R L Boot2, Suzan J W Robroek3, Karen Oude Hengel3,4, Jantien van Berkel1, Emely de Vet1, Pieter Coenen2.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether workplace health promotion programs improve self-perceived health of employees with a low socioeconomic position (SEP), and whether differential effects exist between individuals with a low SEP for gender, marital status or age. Individual participant data from six Dutch intervention studies aiming at promoting healthy behavior and preventing obesity in the work setting, with a total of 1906 participants, were used. The overall intervention effect and interaction effects for gender, marital status and age were evaluated using two-stage meta-analyses with linear mixed regression models. In the first stage effect sizes of each study were estimated, which were pooled in the second stage. Compared to control conditions, workplace health promotion programs did not show an overall improvement in self-perceived health of employees with a low SEP (β0.03 (95%CI: -0.03 to 0.09)). Effects did not differ across gender, marital status and age. Future research could be focused on the determinants of self-perceived health next to health behavior to improve the health of employees with a low SEP.
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Employees; Low socioeconomic position; Self-perceived health; Workplace health promotion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604445      PMCID: PMC7873680          DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SSM Popul Health        ISSN: 2352-8273


  35 in total

1.  Determinants of self-perceived health.

Authors:  M Shields; S Shooshtari
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.796

2.  Factors Associated With Availability of, and Employee Participation in, Comprehensive Workplace Health Promotion in a Large and Diverse Australian Public Sector Setting: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Michelle Kilpatrick; Leigh Blizzard; Kristy Sanderson; Brook Teale; Alison Venn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.

Authors:  Lesley A Stewart; Mike Clarke; Maroeska Rovers; Richard D Riley; Mark Simmonds; Gavin Stewart; Jayne F Tierney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Large variation in predictors of mortality by levels of self-rated health: Results from an 18-year follow-up study.

Authors:  R Reile; A Stickley; M Leinsalu
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Equity-specific effects of 26 Dutch obesity-related lifestyle interventions.

Authors:  Tessa Magnée; Alex Burdorf; Johannes Brug; Stef P M Kremers; Anke Oenema; Patricia van Assema; Nicole P M Ezendam; Lenneke van Genugten; Ingrid J Hendriksen; Marijke Hopman-Rock; Wilma Jansen; Johan de Jong; Paul L Kocken; Willemieke Kroeze; Lydia Kwak; Lilian Lechner; Jascha de Nooijer; Mireille N van Poppel; Suzan J W Robroek; Hanneke Schreurs; Esther M van Sluijs; Ingrid J M Steenhuis; Maartje M van Stralen; Nannah I Tak; Saskia J te Velde; Willemijn M Vermeer; Birgitte Wammes; Marieke F van Wier; Frank J van Lenthe
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Predicting changes in perceived health status.

Authors:  M S Goldstein; J M Siegel; R Boyer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A worksite vitality intervention to improve older workers' lifestyle and vitality-related outcomes: results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jorien E Strijk; Karin I Proper; Allard J van der Beek; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions.

Authors:  M Egan; C Bambra; M Petticrew; M Whitehead
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Suzan Jw Robroek; Frank J van Lenthe; Pepijn van Empelen; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Socio-economic inequalities in the effectiveness of workplace health promotion programmes on body mass index: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suzan J W Robroek; Karen M Oude Hengel; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot; Frank J van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf; Pieter Coenen
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 9.213

View more
  3 in total

1.  A German Model Project for Workplace Health Promotion-Flow of Communication, Information, and Reasons for Non-Participation in the Offered Measures.

Authors:  Regina Lutz; Wolfgang Fischmann; Hans Drexler; Elisabeth Nöhammer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation.

Authors:  Hanneke van Heijster; Jantien van Berkel; Cécile R L Boot; Tineke Abma; Emely de Vet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Perceptions of employees with a low and medium level of education towards workplace health promotion programmes: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Hanne C S Sponselee; Willemieke Kroeze; Suzan J W Robroek; Carry M Renders; Ingrid H M Steenhuis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.135

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.