Literature DB >> 26539768

Factors Associated With Availability of, and Employee Participation in, Comprehensive Workplace Health Promotion in a Large and Diverse Australian Public Sector Setting: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Michelle Kilpatrick1, Leigh Blizzard, Kristy Sanderson, Brook Teale, Alison Venn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore factors associated with the perceived availability of, and reported participation in workplace health promotion activities implemented in the Tasmanian State Service, Australia.
METHODS: Data from 3228 employees were collected in 2013 on sociodemographic and work characteristics, health-related behaviors, and employee-reported availability of and participation in health-related activities. Ratios of prevalence for reported availability and participation by each factor were estimated using negative binomial regression (availability) and Poisson regression (participation).
RESULTS: Significant differences in availability of different activity types were found for numerous factors. Compared with the reference categories, only administrative staff or respondents reporting any leisure-time physical activity were more likely to participate, and smokers and respondents with variable work schedules or cardiometabolic conditions were less likely.
CONCLUSIONS: Employees with suboptimal health-related factors were less likely to engage with activities offered through this comprehensive workplace health promotion initiative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26539768     DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  5 in total

1.  Does employee participation in workplace health promotion depend on the working environment? A cross-sectional study of Danish workers.

Authors:  Marie Birk Jørgensen; Ebbe Villadsen; Hermann Burr; Laura Punnett; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Worksite health promotion and social inequalities in health.

Authors:  Anne C van der Put; Jornt J Mandemakers; John B F de Wit; Tanja van der Lippe
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2020-01-17

Review 3.  The effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs on self-perceived health of employees with a low socioeconomic position: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanneke van Heijster; Cécile R L Boot; Suzan J W Robroek; Karen Oude Hengel; Jantien van Berkel; Emely de Vet; Pieter Coenen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-01-26

4.  Workplace Health Promotion and Mental Health: Three-Year Findings from Partnering Healthy@Work.

Authors:  Lisa Jarman; Angela Martin; Alison Venn; Petr Otahal; Leigh Blizzard; Brook Teale; Kristy Sanderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does workplace health promotion contribute to job stress reduction? Three-year findings from Partnering Healthy@Work.

Authors:  Lisa Jarman; Angela Martin; Alison Venn; Petr Otahal; Kristy Sanderson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.