Literature DB >> 33603696

Development of Attention and Accuracy in Learning a Categorization Task.

Leonora C Coppens1, Christine E S Postema1, Anne Schüler2, Katharina Scheiter1,2, Tamara van Gog1,3.   

Abstract

Being able to categorize objects as similar or different is an essential skill. An important aspect of learning to categorize is learning to attend to relevant features (i.e., features that determine category membership) and ignore irrelevant features of the to-be-categorized objects. Feature variability across objects of different categories is informative, because it allows inferring the rules underlying category membership. In this study, participants learned to categorize fictitious creatures (i.e., aliens). We measured attention to the aliens during learning using eye-tracking and calculated the attentional focus as the ratio of attention to relevant versus irrelevant features. As expected, participants' categorization accuracy improved with practice; however, in contrast to our expectations, their attentional focus did not improve with practice. When computing the attentional focus, attention to the aliens' eyes was disregarded, because while eyes attract a lot of attention, they did not vary across aliens (non-informative feature). Yet, an explorative analysis of attention to eyes suggested that participants' attentional focus did become somewhat more efficient in that over time they learned to ignore the eyes. Results are discussed in the context of the need for instructional methods to improve attentional focus in learning to categorize.
Copyright © 2021 Coppens, Postema, Schüler, Scheiter and van Gog.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; categorization; eye movements; eye-tracking; learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603696      PMCID: PMC7884629          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.544135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  13 in total

Review 1.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze.

Authors:  N J Emery
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby; Corey J Bohil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning.

Authors:  Mark R Blair; Marcus R Watson; Kimberly M Meier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-05-29

4.  The sequence of study changes what information is attended to, encoded, and remembered during category learning.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: the roles of discrimination and retrieval.

Authors:  Monica S Birnbaum; Nate Kornell; Elizabeth Ligon Bjork; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

Review 6.  Social modulators of gaze-mediated orienting of attention: A review.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

Review 7.  Human category learning.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Rules and exemplars in category learning.

Authors:  M A Erickson; J K Kruschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-06

9.  Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.

Authors:  Mark R Blair; Marcus R Watson; R Calen Walshe; Fillip Maj
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Monsters are people too.

Authors:  J Levy; T Foulsham; A Kingstone
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.