Literature DB >> 28333507

The sequence of study changes what information is attended to, encoded, and remembered during category learning.

Paulo F Carvalho1, Robert L Goldstone2.   

Abstract

The sequence of study influences how we learn. Previous research has identified different sequences as potentially beneficial for learning in different contexts and with different materials. Here we investigate the mechanisms involved in inductive category learning that give rise to these sequencing effects. Across 3 experiments we show evidence that the sequence of study changes what information learners attend to during learning, what is encoded from the materials studied and, consequently, what is remembered from study. Interleaved study (alternating between presentation of 2 categories) leads to an attentional focus on properties that differ between successive items, leading to relatively better encoding and memory for item properties that discriminate between categories. Conversely, when learners study each category in a separate block (blocked study), learners encode relatively more strongly the characteristic features of the items, which may be the result of a strong attentional focus on sequential similarities. These results provide support for the sequential attention theory proposing that inductive category learning takes place through a process of sequential comparisons between the current and previous items. Different sequences of items change how attention is deployed depending on this basic process. Which sequence results in better or worse learning depends on the match between what is encoded and what is required at test. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28333507     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

Review 1.  Visual category learning: Navigating the intersection of rules and similarity.

Authors:  Gregory I Hughes; Ayanna K Thomas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 2.  Model-guided search for optimal natural-science-category training exemplars: A work in progress.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Craig A Sanders; Xiaojin Zhu; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Transfer of category learning to impoverished contexts.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Amanda Zamary; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Applying Interleaving Strategy of Learning Materials and Perceptual Modality to Address Secondary Students' Need to Restore Cognitive Capacity.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Chuansheng Chen; Baoping Li; Jiacai Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  A Computational Model of Context-Dependent Encodings During Category Learning.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04

7.  Development of Attention and Accuracy in Learning a Categorization Task.

Authors:  Leonora C Coppens; Christine E S Postema; Anne Schüler; Katharina Scheiter; Tamara van Gog
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  What Is the Mechanism Underlying the Interleaving Effect in Category Induction: An Eye-Tracking and Behavioral Study.

Authors:  Yabo Ge; Fengying Li; Xinyu Li; Weijian Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-16

9.  Model-based fMRI reveals dissimilarity processes underlying base rate neglect.

Authors:  Sean R O'Bryan; Darrell A Worthy; Evan J Livesey; Tyler Davis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Eye contact boosts the reflexive component of overt gaze following.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Giada Alessi; Luigi Castelli; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.