Literature DB >> 33602979

The look ahead trace back optimizer for genomic selection under transparent and opaque simulators.

Fatemeh Amini1, Felipe Restrepo Franco1, Guiping Hu1, Lizhi Wang2.   

Abstract

Recent advances in genomic selection (GS) have demonstrated the importance of not only the accuracy of genomic prediction but also the intelligence of selection strategies. The look ahead selection algorithm, for example, has been found to significantly outperform the widely used truncation selection approach in terms of genetic gain, thanks to its strategy of selecting breeding parents that may not necessarily be elite themselves but have the best chance of producing elite progeny in the future. This paper presents the look ahead trace back algorithm as a new variant of the look ahead approach, which introduces several improvements to further accelerate genetic gain especially under imperfect genomic prediction. Perhaps an even more significant contribution of this paper is the design of opaque simulators for evaluating the performance of GS algorithms. These simulators are partially observable, explicitly capture both additive and non-additive genetic effects, and simulate uncertain recombination events more realistically. In contrast, most existing GS simulation settings are transparent, either explicitly or implicitly allowing the GS algorithm to exploit certain critical information that may not be possible in actual breeding programs. Comprehensive computational experiments were carried out using a maize data set to compare a variety of GS algorithms under four simulators with different levels of opacity. These results reveal how differently a same GS algorithm would interact with different simulators, suggesting the need for continued research in the design of more realistic simulators. As long as GS algorithms continue to be trained in silico rather than in planta, the best way to avoid disappointing discrepancy between their simulated and actual performances may be to make the simulator as akin to the complex and opaque nature as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33602979      PMCID: PMC7893003          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83567-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  25 in total

1.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement.

Authors:  Zeratsion Abera Desta; Rodomiro Ortiz
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Improving Response in Genomic Selection with a Population-Based Selection Strategy: Optimal Population Value Selection.

Authors:  Matthew Goiffon; Aaron Kusmec; Lizhi Wang; Guiping Hu; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Genomic Selection in the Era of Next Generation Sequencing for Complex Traits in Plant Breeding.

Authors:  Javaid A Bhat; Sajad Ali; Romesh K Salgotra; Zahoor A Mir; Sutapa Dutta; Vasudha Jadon; Anshika Tyagi; Muntazir Mushtaq; Neelu Jain; Pradeep K Singh; Gyanendra P Singh; K V Prabhu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Genomic Selection for Drought Tolerance Using Genome-Wide SNPs in Maize.

Authors:  Mittal Shikha; Arora Kanika; Atmakuri Ramakrishna Rao; Mallana Gowdra Mallikarjuna; Hari Shanker Gupta; Thirunavukkarasu Nepolean
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Uncertainties of potentials and recent changes in global yields of major crops resulting from census- and satellite-based yield datasets at multiple resolutions.

Authors:  Toshichika Iizumi; Mizuki Kotoku; Wonsik Kim; Paul C West; James S Gerber; Molly E Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Optimizing Selection and Mating in Genomic Selection with a Look-Ahead Approach: An Operations Research Framework.

Authors:  Saba Moeinizade; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050.

Authors:  Deepak K Ray; Nathaniel D Mueller; Paul C West; Jonathan A Foley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genetic control of morphometric diversity in the maize shoot apical meristem.

Authors:  Samuel Leiboff; Xianran Li; Heng-Cheng Hu; Natalie Todt; Jinliang Yang; Xiao Li; Xiaoqing Yu; Gary J Muehlbauer; Marja C P Timmermans; Jianming Yu; Patrick S Schnable; Michael J Scanlon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  The L-shaped selection algorithm for multitrait genomic selection.

Authors:  Fatemeh Amini; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang; Ruoyu Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.402

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.