Literature DB >> 33602254

FOPR test: a virtual reality-based technique to assess field of perception and field of regard in hemispatial neglect.

Tae-Lim Kim1, Kwanguk Kim2, Changyeol Choi2, Ji-Yeong Lee1, Joon-Ho Shin3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously proposed a novel virtual reality-based method to assess human field of perception (FOP) and field of regard (FOR), termed the FOPR test. This study assessed the diagnostic validity of the FOPR test for hemispatial neglect (HSN).
METHODS: We included 19 stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and with HSN (HSN+SS), 22 stroke patients with a lesion in the right hemisphere and without HSN (HSN-SS), and 22 healthy controls aged 19-65 years. The success rate (SR) and response time (RT) in the FOPR test for both FOP and FOR were assessed (FOP-SR, FOR-SR, FOP-RT, and FOR-RT, respectively). Using a Bland-Altman plot, agreements between the FOPR test and conventional tests were confirmed, and the FOPR test accuracy was verified using the support vector machine (SVM). Measured values were analysed using ANOVA and Kruskall-Wallis tests for group comparison.
RESULTS: The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between FOPR test and conventional tests; individuals within 95% agreement limits were within the range of 94.8-100.0%. The SVM classification accuracy, using FOP and FOR variables from the left hemispace, ranged from 83.3 to 100.0% in a binary classification (HSN vs non-HSN). The FOPR test demonstrated differences in SR and RT for both FOP and FOR across the groups.
CONCLUSION: The FOPR test was valid for the HSN diagnosis and provided quantitative and intuitive information regarding visuospatial function. Furthermore, it might enhance our understanding of visuospatial function including HSN by applying the time relative component and concepts of perception and exploration, FOP and FOR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03463122. Registered 13 March 2018, retrospectively registered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Field of perception; Field of regard; Hemispheric stroke; Rehabilitation; Virtual reality; Visuospatial function

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33602254      PMCID: PMC7890954          DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00835-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil        ISSN: 1743-0003            Impact factor:   4.262


  27 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  Using reaction time to assess patients with unilateral neglect and extinction.

Authors:  Krista L Schendel; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Reliability and validity of the Virtual Reality Lateralized Attention Test in assessing hemispatial neglect in right-hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Amanda M Dawson; Drew Linsley
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Monocular patching in subjects with right-hemisphere stroke affects perceptual-attentional bias.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Stephanie Burkholder
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 May-Jun

5.  Preattentive processes guide visual search: evidence from patients with unilateral visual neglect.

Authors:  M Grabowecky; L C Robertson; A Treisman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Human field of regard, field of view, and attention bias.

Authors:  Woncheol Jang; Joon-Ho Shin; Mingyu Kim; Kwanguk Kenny Kim
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke?

Authors:  Jennifer Rengachary; Giovanni d'Avossa; Ayelet Sapir; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Presence of Motor-Intentional Aiming Deficit Predicts Functional Improvement of Spatial Neglect With Prism Adaptation.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Peii Chen; Raymond C Boston; Anne L Foundas; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 10.  Assessment and rehabilitation of neglect using virtual reality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elisa Pedroli; Silvia Serino; Pietro Cipresso; Federica Pallavicini; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  4 in total

1.  Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update.

Authors:  S Cavedoni; P Cipresso; V Mancuso; F Bruni; E Pedroli
Journal:  Virtual Real       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.697

2.  EEG-Based Identification of Emotional Neural State Evoked by Virtual Environment Interaction.

Authors:  Dawoon Jung; Junggu Choi; Jeongjae Kim; Seoyoung Cho; Sanghoon Han
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Virtual Reality and Eye-Tracking Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Systematic Review and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Alexander Pilgaard Kaiser; Kristian Westergaard Villadsen; Afshin Samani; Hendrik Knoche; Lars Evald
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  Various tests of left neglect are associated with distinct territories of hypoperfusion in acute stroke.

Authors:  Colin Stein; Lisa Bunker; Brian Chu; Richard Leigh; Andreia Faria; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-03-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.