UNLABELLED: Rengachary J, d'Avossa G, Sapir A, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Is the Posner Reaction Time Test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke? OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of common clinical tests for left neglect with that of a computerized reaction time Posner test in a stroke population. DESIGN: Neglect measures were collected longitudinally in patients with stroke at the acute ( approximately 2wk) and chronic ( approximately 9mo) stages. Identical measures were collected in a healthy control group. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with acute stroke (n=59) with left neglect, 30 of whom were tested longitudinally; healthy age-matched controls (n=30). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A receiver operating characteristic analysis ranking the measures' sensitivity and specificity using a single summary statistic. RESULTS: Most clinical tests were adequately accurate at the acute stage, but many were near chance at the chronic stage. The Posner test was the most sensitive test at both stages. The most sensitive variable was the reaction time difference for detecting targets appearing on the left compared with the right side. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized reaction time tests can be used to screen for subtle but potentially clinically relevant left neglect, which may not be detectable by conventional clinical tests, especially at the chronic stage. Such tests may be useful to assess the severity of the patients' deficits and provide more accurate measures of the degree of recovery in clinical trials than established clinical measures.
UNLABELLED: Rengachary J, d'Avossa G, Sapir A, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Is the Posner Reaction Time Test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke? OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of common clinical tests for left neglect with that of a computerized reaction time Posner test in a stroke population. DESIGN: Neglect measures were collected longitudinally in patients with stroke at the acute ( approximately 2wk) and chronic ( approximately 9mo) stages. Identical measures were collected in a healthy control group. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with acute stroke (n=59) with left neglect, 30 of whom were tested longitudinally; healthy age-matched controls (n=30). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A receiver operating characteristic analysis ranking the measures' sensitivity and specificity using a single summary statistic. RESULTS: Most clinical tests were adequately accurate at the acute stage, but many were near chance at the chronic stage. The Posner test was the most sensitive test at both stages. The most sensitive variable was the reaction time difference for detecting targets appearing on the left compared with the right side. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized reaction time tests can be used to screen for subtle but potentially clinically relevant left neglect, which may not be detectable by conventional clinical tests, especially at the chronic stage. Such tests may be useful to assess the severity of the patients' deficits and provide more accurate measures of the degree of recovery in clinical trials than established clinical measures.
Authors: Philippe Azouvi; Sylvie Olivier; Godeleine de Montety; Christiane Samuel; Anne Louis-Dreyfus; Luigi Tesio Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: W T Longstreth; Alice M Arnold; Norman J Beauchamp; Teri A Manolio; David Lefkowitz; Charles Jungreis; Calvin H Hirsch; Daniel H O'Leary; Curt D Furberg Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Antonello Baldassarre; Lenny Ramsey; Carl L Hacker; Alicia Callejas; Serguei V Astafiev; Nicholas V Metcalf; Kristi Zinn; Jennifer Rengachary; Abraham Z Snyder; Alex R Carter; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta Journal: Brain Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Alex R Carter; Mark P McAvoy; Joshua S Siegel; Xin Hong; Serguei V Astafiev; Jennifer Rengachary; Kristi Zinn; Nicholas V Metcalf; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta Journal: Cortex Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Lenny E Ramsey; Joshua S Siegel; Antonello Baldassarre; Nicholas V Metcalf; Kristina Zinn; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alex R Carter; Serguei V Astafiev; Catherine E Lang; Lisa T Connor; Jennifer Rengachary; Michael J Strube; Daniel L W Pope; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Elyse L Aufman; Marghuretta D Bland; Peggy P Barco; David B Carr; Catherine E Lang Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.159