Literature DB >> 33600841

Using multilevel models for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Hannah I Volpert-Esmond1, Elizabeth Page-Gould2, Bruce D Bartholow3.   

Abstract

Multilevel modeling (MLM) is becoming increasingly accessible and popular in the analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs). In this article, we review the benefits of MLM for analyzing psychophysiological data, which often contains repeated observations within participants, and introduce some of the decision-making points in the analytic process, including how to set up the data set, specify the model, conduct hypothesis tests, and visualize the model estimates. We highlight how the use of MLM can extend the types of theoretical questions that can be answered using ERPs, including investigations of how ERPs vary meaningfully across trials within a testing session. We also address reporting practices and provide tools to calculate effect sizes and simulate power curves. Ultimately, we hope this review contributes to emerging best practices for the use of MLM with psychophysiological data.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Event-related potentials; Multilevel modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33600841      PMCID: PMC8050933          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  72 in total

Review 1.  Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; John H Krystal
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03

2.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

3.  The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned.

Authors:  Jona Sassenhagen; Matthias Schlesewsky; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R.

Authors:  Steven G Luke
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

5.  Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items.

Authors:  Markus Brauer; John J Curtin
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-11-27

6.  Using trial-level data and multilevel modeling to investigate within-task change in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Edgar C Merkle; Meredith P Levsen; Tiffany A Ito; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 7.  Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem.

Authors:  Charles M Judd; Jacob Westfall; David A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

8.  Heart Rate Variability Moderates the Association Between Separation-Related Psychological Distress and Blood Pressure Reactivity Over Time.

Authors:  Kyle J Bourassa; Karen Hasselmo; David A Sbarra
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-06-14

9.  Modeling Single-Trial ERP Reveals Modulation of Bottom-Up Face Visual Processing by Top-Down Task Constraints (in Some Subjects).

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Carl M Gaspar; Kacper P Wieczorek; Cyril R Pernet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-23

10.  Estimation accuracy in the psychological sciences.

Authors:  Clintin P Davis-Stober; Jason Dana; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hormonal contraceptive use moderates the association between worry and error-related brain activity.

Authors:  Courtney C Louis; Chelsea Kneip; Tim P Moran; Adriene M Beltz; Kelly L Klump; Jason S Moser
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Behavioral response bias and event-related brain potentials implicate elevated incentive salience attribution to alcohol cues in emerging adults with lower sensitivity to alcohol.

Authors:  Roberto U Cofresí; Casey B Kohen; Courtney A Motschman; Reinout W Wiers; Thomas M Piasecki; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.526

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.