Literature DB >> 29172609

Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items.

Markus Brauer1, John J Curtin1.   

Abstract

In this article we address a number of important issues that arise in the analysis of nonindependent data. Such data are common in studies in which predictors vary within "units" (e.g., within-subjects, within-classrooms). Most researchers analyze categorical within-unit predictors with repeated-measures ANOVAs, but continuous within-unit predictors with linear mixed-effects models (LMEMs). We show that both types of predictor variables can be analyzed within the LMEM framework. We discuss designs with multiple sources of nonindependence, for example, studies in which the same subjects rate the same set of items or in which students nested in classrooms provide multiple answers. We provide clear guidelines about the types of random effects that should be included in the analysis of such designs. We also present a number of corrective steps that researchers can take when convergence fails in LMEM models with too many parameters. We end with a brief discussion on the trade-off between power and generalizability in designs with "within-unit" predictors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29172609     DOI: 10.1037/met0000159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  52 in total

1.  Probabilistic learning of emotion categories.

Authors:  Rista C Plate; Adrienne Wood; Kristina Woodard; Seth D Pollak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-12-20

2.  Quantifying robustness of the /t/-/k/ contrast using a single, static spectral feature.

Authors:  Allison A Johnson; Patrick F Reidy; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individual Differences in the Association Between Subjective Stress and Heart Rate Are Related to Psychological and Physical Well-Being.

Authors:  Sasha L Sommerfeldt; Stacey M Schaefer; Markus Brauer; Carol D Ryff; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12

4.  Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Pier; Markus Brauer; Amarette Filut; Anna Kaatz; Joshua Raclaw; Mitchell J Nathan; Cecilia E Ford; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A sad thumbs up: incongruent gestures and disrupted sensorimotor activity both slow processing of facial expressions.

Authors:  Adrienne Wood; Jared D Martin; Martha W Alibali; Paula M Niedenthal
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2018-11-15

6.  Relationship satisfaction predicts lower stress and inflammation in breast cancer survivors: A longitudinal study of within-person and between-person effects.

Authors:  M Rosie Shrout; Megan E Renna; Annelise A Madison; Catherine M Alfano; Stephen P Povoski; Adele M Lipari; Doreen M Agnese; Lisa D Yee; William E Carson; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.905

7.  Little race or gender bias in an experiment of initial review of NIH R01 grant proposals.

Authors:  Patrick S Forscher; William T L Cox; Markus Brauer; Patricia G Devine
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-01-28

8.  Stressed connections: cortisol levels following acute psychosocial stress disrupt affiliative mimicry in humans.

Authors:  Jonas P Nitschke; Cecile S Sunahara; Evan W Carr; Piotr Winkielman; Jens C Pruessner; Jennifer A Bartz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Shared striatal activity in decisions to satisfy curiosity and hunger at the risk of electric shocks.

Authors:  Johnny King L Lau; Hiroki Ozono; Kei Kuratomi; Asuka Komiya; Kou Murayama
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-30

Review 10.  Using multilevel models for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Elizabeth Page-Gould; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.