Literature DB >> 25151545

The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned.

Jona Sassenhagen1, Matthias Schlesewsky2, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky3.   

Abstract

The P600, a late positive ERP component following linguistically deviant stimuli, is commonly seen as indexing structural, high-level processes, e.g. of linguistic (re)analysis. It has also been identified with the P3 (P600-as-P3 hypothesis), which is thought to reflect a systemic neuromodulator release facilitating behavioural shifts and is usually response time aligned. We investigated single-trial alignment of the P600 to response, a critical prediction of the P600-as-P3 hypothesis. Participants heard sentences containing morphosyntactic and semantic violations and responded via a button press. The elicited P600 was perfectly response aligned, while an N400 following semantic deviations was stimulus aligned. This is, to our knowledge, the first single-trial analysis of language processing data using within-sentence behavioural responses as temporal covariates. Results support the P600-as-P3 perspective and thus constitute a step towards a neurophysiological grounding of language-related ERPs.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Locus Coeruleus; N400; P3; P600; Reorienting; Semantics; Sentence processing; Single-trial analysis; Syntax

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151545     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  32 in total

1.  The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.

Authors:  Michelle Leckey; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Native-language N400 and P600 predict dissociable language-learning abilities in adults.

Authors:  Zhenghan Qi; Sara D Beach; Amy S Finn; Jennifer Minas; Calvin Goetz; Brian Chan; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Trevor Brothers; Edward W Wlotko
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The Effect of Emotional State on the Processing of Morphosyntactic and Semantic Reversal Anomalies in Japanese: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Masataka Yano; Yui Suzuki; Masatoshi Koizumi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02

5.  Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Idan Asher Blank; Matthew Siegelman; Zachary Mineroff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-06-20

6.  Pupil Dilation Response to Prosody and Syntax During Auditory Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Özgür Aydın; İpek Pınar Uzun
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 7.  Using multilevel models for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Elizabeth Page-Gould; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.

Authors:  Anne L Beatty-Martínez; Michelle R Bruni; María Teresa Bajo; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.348

Review 9.  Tea With Milk? A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Sequential Event Comprehension.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-10-06

10.  The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: evidence from case marking.

Authors:  Balthasar Bickel; Alena Witzlack-Makarevich; Kamal K Choudhary; Matthias Schlesewsky; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.