Literature DB >> 33598887

A new hypertonic saline assay for analgesic screening in mice: effects of animal strain, sex, and diurnal phase.

Yahya I Asiri1, Desmond H Fung2, Timothy Fung2, Alasdair M Barr2,3, Ernest Puil2, Stephan K W Schwarz4,5, Bernard A MacLeod2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There exists a pressing need for the identification of novel analgesics. We recently reported on a new preclinical assay for rapid analgesic screening based on intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of 10% hypertonic saline (HS) in female outbred (CD-1) mice. Herein, we characterized the HS assay's performance in inbred (C57BL/6) mice, sensitivity to sex differences, and effects of diurnal rhythm phase.
METHODS: In randomized, controlled, blinded in vivo animal experiments, we studied nociceptive responses induced by i.pl. HS in C57BL/6 (vs CD-1) mice of both sexes (n = 240) and determined diurnal rhythm phase effects in female animals. We established the HS assay's sensitivity to morphine by constructing dose-response curves and calculating half-maximal inhibitory doses (ID50s).
RESULTS: The injection of i.pl. HS produced nociceptive (licking and biting) responses in all C57BL/6 mice tested. In both C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice, the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) response magnitudes were greater in females vs males (C57BL/6: 87 sec [64 to 110] vs 45 sec [29 to 61]; difference in means, 42 sec; 95% CI, 17 to 68; P < 0.001; n = 10/group; CD-1: 110 sec [95 to 126] vs 53 sec [32 to 74]; difference in means, 57 sec; 95% CI, 34 to 79; P < 0.001; n = 10/group). The mean (95% CI) nociceptive responses were greater at 24:00 hr than at 12:00 hr in C57BL/6 mice (64 sec [40 to 88] vs 37 sec [24 to 51]; difference in means, 27 sec; 95% CI, 7 to 47; P = 0.007; n = 10/group), but not in CD-1 mice (P = 0.97). Intravenous morphine dose-dependently attenuated nociceptive responses of both C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice (ID50, 0.6 and 2.5 mg·kg-1, respectively; P = 0.41).
CONCLUSION: These findings in inbred and outbred mice solidify the utility of the HS assay as an effective, rapid, robust, and versatile preclinical tool for analgesic screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain measurement/drug effects; analgesics; disease models/animals; drug evaluation; drug screening; mice; preclinical

Year:  2021        PMID: 33598887     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-01923-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  56 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of nociception.

Authors:  D Le Bars; M Gozariu; S W Cadden
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 2.  The necessity of animal models in pain research.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Mogil; Karen D Davis; Stuart W Derbyshire
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  The discovery and development of analgesics: new mechanisms, new modalities.

Authors:  Gillian Burgess; Dic Williams
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Overcoming obstacles to developing new analgesics.

Authors:  Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Development of New Analgesics: An Answer to Opioid Epidemic.

Authors:  Tony L Yaksh; Matthew A Hunt; Gilson G Dos Santos
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 6.  The opioid crisis in Canada: a national perspective.

Authors:  Lisa Belzak; Jessica Halverson
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The development of new analgesics over the past 50 years: a lack of real breakthrough drugs.

Authors:  Igor Kissin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Genitourinary medicine clinics may not see young men who have sex with men before they become infected with human papillomavirus (HPV).

Authors:  Emily Clarke; Courtney Burtenshaw; Megan Goddard; Raj Patel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-08-19

9.  An Intraplantar Hypertonic Saline Assay in Mice for Rapid Screening of Analgesics.

Authors:  Yahya I Asiri; Timothy Fung; Stephan K W Schwarz; Khalid A Asseri; Ian D Welch; Catherine A Schuppli; Alasdair M Barr; Richard A Wall; Ernest Puil; Bernard A MacLeod
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2017.

Authors:  Lawrence Scholl; Puja Seth; Mbabazi Kariisa; Nana Wilson; Grant Baldwin
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 17.586

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.