Tejas Sinha1, Kyle Stinehart2, Cashay Moorer3, Carleen Spitzer4. 1. Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. 2. Fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. 3. Medical Simulation Specialist, Clinical Skills Education and Assessment Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is present in approximately 10% of ICU admissions and is associated with great morbidity and mortality. Prone ventilation has been shown to improve refractory hypoxemia and mortality in patients with ARDS. Methods: In this simulation, a 70-year-old male had been transferred to the ICU for ARDS and was undergoing scheduled prone ventilation as part of his care when he experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to a tension pneumothorax. Learners demonstrated how to manage cardiac arrest in a prone patient and subsequently identified and treated the tension pneumothorax that was the cause of his initial arrest. This single-session simulation for internal medicine residents (PGY 1-PGY 4) utilized a prone mannequin connected to a ventilator in a high-fidelity simulation center. Following the simulation, facilitators led a team debriefing and reviewed key learning objectives. Results: A total of 103 internal medicine residents participated in this simulation. Of those, 43 responded to a postsimulation survey. Forty-two of 43 agreed or strongly agreed that all learning objectives were met, that the simulation was appropriate for their level of training, and that their participation would be useful for their future practice. Discussion: We designed this simulation to improve learners' familiarity with prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to enhance overall comfort with cardiac arrest management. Postsimulation survey results and debriefings revealed that the simulation was a valuable education opportunity, and learners felt that their participation in this simulation would be helpful in their future practice.
Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is present in approximately 10% of ICU admissions and is associated with great morbidity and mortality. Prone ventilation has been shown to improve refractory hypoxemia and mortality in patients with ARDS. Methods: In this simulation, a 70-year-old male had been transferred to the ICU for ARDS and was undergoing scheduled prone ventilation as part of his care when he experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to a tension pneumothorax. Learners demonstrated how to manage cardiac arrest in a prone patient and subsequently identified and treated the tension pneumothorax that was the cause of his initial arrest. This single-session simulation for internal medicine residents (PGY 1-PGY 4) utilized a prone mannequin connected to a ventilator in a high-fidelity simulation center. Following the simulation, facilitators led a team debriefing and reviewed key learning objectives. Results: A total of 103 internal medicine residents participated in this simulation. Of those, 43 responded to a postsimulation survey. Forty-two of 43 agreed or strongly agreed that all learning objectives were met, that the simulation was appropriate for their level of training, and that their participation would be useful for their future practice. Discussion: We designed this simulation to improve learners' familiarity with prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to enhance overall comfort with cardiac arrest management. Postsimulation survey results and debriefings revealed that the simulation was a valuable education opportunity, and learners felt that their participation in this simulation would be helpful in their future practice.
Authors: Giacomo Bellani; John G Laffey; Tài Pham; Eddy Fan; Laurent Brochard; Andres Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Frank van Haren; Anders Larsson; Daniel F McAuley; Marco Ranieri; Gordon Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Hermann Wrigge; Arthur S Slutsky; Antonio Pesenti Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P Pelosi; D Tubiolo; D Mascheroni; P Vicardi; S Crotti; F Valenza; L Gattinoni Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: L Blanch; J Mancebo; M Perez; M Martinez; A Mas; A J Betbese; D Joseph; J Ballús; U Lucangelo; E Bak Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Diana M Cave; Raul J Gazmuri; Charles W Otto; Vinay M Nadkarni; Adam Cheng; Steven C Brooks; Mohamud Daya; Robert M Sutton; Richard Branson; Mary Fran Hazinski Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sean P Mazer; Myron Weisfeldt; Diane Bai; Carol Cardinale; Rohit Arora; Cecilia Ma; Robert R Sciacca; David Chong; LeRoy E Rabbani Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Matthew J Douma; Ella MacKenzie; Tess Loch; Maria C Tan; Dustin Anderson; Christopher Picard; Lazar Milovanovic; Domhnall O'Dochartaigh; Peter G Brindley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Kobi Ludwin; Lukasz Szarpak; Kurt Ruetzler; Jacek Smereka; Bernd W Böttiger; Milosz Jaguszewski; Krzysztof Jerzy Filipiak Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 6.627