Giacomo Bellani1, John G Laffey2, Tài Pham3, Eddy Fan4, Laurent Brochard5, Andres Esteban6, Luciano Gattinoni7, Frank van Haren8, Anders Larsson9, Daniel F McAuley10, Marco Ranieri11, Gordon Rubenfeld12, B Taylor Thompson13, Hermann Wrigge14, Arthur S Slutsky15, Antonio Pesenti7. 1. School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy2Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. 2. Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St Michael's Hospital4Departments of Anesthesia, Physiology and Interdepartmental division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada. 3. AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Unité de Réanimation médico-chirurgicale, Pôle Thorax Voies aériennes, Groupe hospitalier des Hôpitaux Universitaires de l'Est Parisien, Paris, France6UMR 1153, Inserm, Sorbonne Paris Cité, ECSTRA Team, Université Paris Diderot, Pari. 4. Department of Medicine, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital9Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 5. Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada11Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 6. Hospital Universitario de Getafe, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain. 7. Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Ospedale Maggiore, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy. 8. Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, and Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. 9. Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 10. Centre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland17Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, Northern Ireland18Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, No. 11. SAPIENZA Università di ROMA, Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Roma, Italy. 12. Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada21Program in Trauma, Emergency and Critical Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada. 13. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 14. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. 15. Keenan Research Center at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, the Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, and the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Limited information exists about the epidemiology, recognition, management, and outcomes of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intensive care unit (ICU) incidence and outcome of ARDS and to assess clinician recognition, ventilation management, and use of adjuncts-for example prone positioning-in routine clinical practice for patients fulfilling the ARDS Berlin Definition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) was an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients undergoing invasive or noninvasive ventilation, conducted during 4 consecutive weeks in the winter of 2014 in a convenience sample of 459 ICUs from 50 countries across 5 continents. EXPOSURES: Acute respiratory distress syndrome. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was ICU incidence of ARDS. Secondary outcomes included assessment of clinician recognition of ARDS, the application of ventilatory management, the use of adjunctive interventions in routine clinical practice, and clinical outcomes from ARDS. RESULTS: Of 29,144 patients admitted to participating ICUs, 3022 (10.4%) fulfilled ARDS criteria. Of these, 2377 patients developed ARDS in the first 48 hours and whose respiratory failure was managed with invasive mechanical ventilation. The period prevalence of mild ARDS was 30.0% (95% CI, 28.2%-31.9%); of moderate ARDS, 46.6% (95% CI, 44.5%-48.6%); and of severe ARDS, 23.4% (95% CI, 21.7%-25.2%). ARDS represented 0.42 cases per ICU bed over 4 weeks and represented 10.4% (95% CI, 10.0%-10.7%) of ICU admissions and 23.4% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Clinical recognition of ARDS ranged from 51.3% (95% CI, 47.5%-55.0%) in mild to 78.5% (95% CI, 74.8%-81.8%) in severe ARDS. Less than two-thirds of patients with ARDS received a tidal volume 8 of mL/kg or less of predicted body weight. Plateau pressure was measured in 40.1% (95% CI, 38.2-42.1), whereas 82.6% (95% CI, 81.0%-84.1%) received a positive end-expository pressure (PEEP) of less than 12 cm H2O. Prone positioning was used in 16.3% (95% CI, 13.7%-19.2%) of patients with severe ARDS. Clinician recognition of ARDS was associated with higher PEEP, greater use of neuromuscular blockade, and prone positioning. Hospital mortality was 34.9% (95% CI, 31.4%-38.5%) for those with mild, 40.3% (95% CI, 37.4%-43.3%) for those with moderate, and 46.1% (95% CI, 41.9%-50.4%) for those with severe ARDS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among ICUs in 50 countries, the period prevalence of ARDS was 10.4% of ICU admissions. This syndrome appeared to be underrecognized and undertreated and associated with a high mortality rate. These findings indicate the potential for improvement in the management of patients with ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02010073.
IMPORTANCE: Limited information exists about the epidemiology, recognition, management, and outcomes of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intensive care unit (ICU) incidence and outcome of ARDS and to assess clinician recognition, ventilation management, and use of adjuncts-for example prone positioning-in routine clinical practice for patients fulfilling the ARDS Berlin Definition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) was an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients undergoing invasive or noninvasive ventilation, conducted during 4 consecutive weeks in the winter of 2014 in a convenience sample of 459 ICUs from 50 countries across 5 continents. EXPOSURES: Acute respiratory distress syndrome. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was ICU incidence of ARDS. Secondary outcomes included assessment of clinician recognition of ARDS, the application of ventilatory management, the use of adjunctive interventions in routine clinical practice, and clinical outcomes from ARDS. RESULTS: Of 29,144 patients admitted to participating ICUs, 3022 (10.4%) fulfilled ARDS criteria. Of these, 2377 patients developed ARDS in the first 48 hours and whose respiratory failure was managed with invasive mechanical ventilation. The period prevalence of mild ARDS was 30.0% (95% CI, 28.2%-31.9%); of moderate ARDS, 46.6% (95% CI, 44.5%-48.6%); and of severe ARDS, 23.4% (95% CI, 21.7%-25.2%). ARDS represented 0.42 cases per ICU bed over 4 weeks and represented 10.4% (95% CI, 10.0%-10.7%) of ICU admissions and 23.4% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Clinical recognition of ARDS ranged from 51.3% (95% CI, 47.5%-55.0%) in mild to 78.5% (95% CI, 74.8%-81.8%) in severe ARDS. Less than two-thirds of patients with ARDS received a tidal volume 8 of mL/kg or less of predicted body weight. Plateau pressure was measured in 40.1% (95% CI, 38.2-42.1), whereas 82.6% (95% CI, 81.0%-84.1%) received a positive end-expository pressure (PEEP) of less than 12 cm H2O. Prone positioning was used in 16.3% (95% CI, 13.7%-19.2%) of patients with severe ARDS. Clinician recognition of ARDS was associated with higher PEEP, greater use of neuromuscular blockade, and prone positioning. Hospital mortality was 34.9% (95% CI, 31.4%-38.5%) for those with mild, 40.3% (95% CI, 37.4%-43.3%) for those with moderate, and 46.1% (95% CI, 41.9%-50.4%) for those with severe ARDS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among ICUs in 50 countries, the period prevalence of ARDS was 10.4% of ICU admissions. This syndrome appeared to be underrecognized and undertreated and associated with a high mortality rate. These findings indicate the potential for improvement in the management of patients with ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02010073.
Authors: Laura E Fredenburgh; Mark A Perrella; Diana Barragan-Bradford; Dean R Hess; Elizabeth Peters; Karen E Welty-Wolf; Bryan D Kraft; R Scott Harris; Rie Maurer; Kiichi Nakahira; Clara Oromendia; John D Davies; Angelica Higuera; Kristen T Schiffer; Joshua A Englert; Paul B Dieffenbach; David A Berlin; Susan Lagambina; Mark Bouthot; Andrew I Sullivan; Paul F Nuccio; Mamary T Kone; Mona J Malik; Maria Angelica Pabon Porras; Eli Finkelsztein; Tilo Winkler; Shelley Hurwitz; Charles N Serhan; Claude A Piantadosi; Rebecca M Baron; B Taylor Thompson; Augustine Mk Choi Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-12-06
Authors: Thomas S Metkus; Eliseo Guallar; Lori Sokoll; David Morrow; Gordon Tomaselli; Roy Brower; Steven Schulman; Frederick K Korley Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: C Guérin; P Beuret; J M Constantin; G Bellani; P Garcia-Olivares; O Roca; J H Meertens; P Azevedo Maia; T Becher; J Peterson; A Larsson; M Gurjar; Z Hajjej; F Kovari; A H Assiri; E Mainas; M S Hasan; D R Morocho-Tutillo; L Baboi; J M Chrétien; G François; L Ayzac; L Chen; L Brochard; A Mercat Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nuala J Meyer; John P Reilly; Rui Feng; Jason D Christie; Stanley L Hazen; Carolyn J Albert; Jacob D Franke; Celine L Hartman; Jane McHowat; David A Ford Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-12-07
Authors: Elizabeth A Middleton; Matthew T Rondina; Hansjorg Schwertz; Guy A Zimmerman Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Carolyn S Calfee; Kevin L Delucchi; Pratik Sinha; Michael A Matthay; Jonathan Hackett; Manu Shankar-Hari; Cliona McDowell; John G Laffey; Cecilia M O'Kane; Daniel F McAuley Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: J Hunter Mehaffey; Eric J Charles; Ashish K Sharma; Morgan Salmon; Dustin Money; Sarah Schubert; Mark H Stoler; Curtis G Tribble; Victor E Laubach; Mark E Roeser; Irving L Kron Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 4.330